Farmers lose autonomy as MNCs take control of agriculture
“The Light” and PGCC cast a shadow over Penang
What they showed you: Night view (towards George Town) of the PGCC’s “iconic towers” (Image from the official PGCC launch booklet)
What they didn’t show you: Add in 37 towers (Image editing by the PGCC Campaign Group)
Even before the PGCC can take off, another massive project, dubbed “The Light”, has been unveiled. The extra commercial space from this waterfront development could lead to a commercial property glut, if there isn’t already one in Penang. It could also “kill off” the PGCC project even before the latter has got off the ground, given that IJM is a far more established developer than the PGCC’s Equine/Abad Naluri. (But then again, Equine/Abad Naluri has already made a “killing” from the revaluation of the property following the authorities’ irresponsible and highly questionable conversion of the Turf Club land from open recreational area to mixed development use. Abad Naluri bought the property at RM43 per sq ft but after the conversion, the value has shot up to RM250-300psf – a staggering profit before the first bulldozer can even rumble in. Who said it’s difficult to become a billionaire!)
Yesterday, I was driving along the Jelutong coastal road, trying to spot the exact location of “The Light” project, when I spotted a small IJM signboard. It was located on the sea-front halfway between Tesco and the Penang Bridge, somewhere almost opposite the E-Gate complex, just north of the Penang Bridge. I could see some land reclamation work already in progress.
More “iconic towers”: What “The Light”, just north of the Penang Bridge, will look like (Image credit: IJM)
Oh, my word!: Model of “The Light” from a vantage point directly above the island side of the Penang Bridge, looking north towards George Town (Photo credit: IJM)
“The Light” is part of the Jelutong Expressway privatisation project, which IJM was involved in. The Penang state government must reveal the exact financial details and terms of the deal. How much did the expressway cost to build? And what exactly was agreed with IJM for undertaking that project? Did the deal take into consideration the current value for reclaimed land? The first question which comes to mind is, how many low- and medium-cost houses will IJM build in this project? If I am not wrong, the entire land reclamation plan (not just for “The Light) calls for more than half of the homes (5,500 homes) to be low- and medium-cost while there will only be 4,600 “other residential units”. So why is it there is no talk about such affordable housing in press reports, which leaves the reader to assume that “The Light” is only for the well-heeled. In fact, a Star report on the IJM website says: “There will also be waterfront homes with private jetties and high-end condominiums for those who can afford them. ” (emphasis mine) Another Star report says the residential component of “The Light” will comprise 1,000 luxurious low-rise, high-rise and landed residential homes over 42 acres and it will be a “gated community”. It raises the highly pertinent question: Development for whom? for whose benefit?IJM Unveils RM6.5 Bln Residential, Commercial Development Project
PENANG, Nov 23 (Bernama) — IJM Properties Sdn Bhd is set to transform Penang into a world class economic and residential hub with the unveiling of its project, The Light Waterfront Penang. IJM Corp Bhd chief executive officer/managing director, Datuk Krishnan Tan, said the RM6.5 billion mixed residential and commercial development was the island’s first integrated waterfront city and would be built on part of the 137 hectares of reclaimed land along Penang’s eastern coastline. “The Light will feature 62ha of breathtaking development on the reclaimed land and will be developed in three phases,” he said at ceremony to unveil the project here today. He said under phase one, covering 17ha, six parcels of high-end waterfront residences, comprising 1,186 units, would be developed. “The development is expected to be completed in three to five years,” he said. Tan said under phase two, a commercial and retail city, comprising Gateway Towers, hotels, signature offices, showrooms, banquet and conference facilities, cultural hall, visitor centre and waterfront amphitheatre would be developed on 41.7ha. “One unique feature of the city is the floating stage and a floating restaurant. The entire city will also be interconnected by water taxis,” he said. He said The Light would also feature three ha of seafront park under phase three of the development. Tan said the project, which will developed by IJM Properties Sdn Bhd’s subsidiary, Jelutong Development Sdn Bhd, was expected to be completed in 2017. “Land reclamation is in progress and construction will start by the end of next year,” he said. http://www.bernama.com.my/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=298086All in, 325 acres are to be developed (including 275 acres to be reclaimed) along the entire Jelutong Expressway coastline. The total net built-up area (residential, commercial, industrial) comes to a breathtaking 28 million acres. Which brings us to the question: how much is the state government getting from IJM out of this? Do we really need all these types of massive development projects catering to the elite and the well-heeled? What’s with all these “iconic towers” anyway, almost as if we are sticking two fingers out to the world? Do we honestly believe that other Malaysians and tourists are dying to see more skyscrapers, that they will come all the way to see our “iconic towers”? Here’s what one urban planning expert has to say about these massive projects:
Unfortunately the developers keep on missing the point, or rather their eyes have been blinded by $$$$$! The best urban places in the world that attract millions of tourists (e.g. Venice or Siena in Italy and Curitiba in Brazil) are places with authentic, unique charms in their people, culture, vernacular architecture and natural assets – not empty spaces with high-rise towers and so-called world class shopping complexes. After some decades, La Defense is still nowhere close to good old Paris in terms of sense and spirit of place! Tourists and locals enjoy old Parisian quarters and streets, not sterile spaces in La Defense! Both the Light and PGCC are not desirable forms of development. Most local Penangites (people in the street like us) won’t gain a bit from them. Having one is a nightmare, having two is “I-can’t-think- of-a-suitable- adjective”! Why do our developers not have any sense of what more sustainable and liveable development should be like? Why does our local authority not reject development proposals like these and put forward a vision and masterplan to make Penang the world capital for sustainable and liveable development? These are not theoretical questions; many world renown architects and masterplanners have successfully designed development projects that are more sustainable and liveable in other countries. Sustainability and liveability are as practical as they may sound theoretical. Penang should not follow the footsteps of Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and the like. Penang should be just Penang in its most original, sustainable and liveable manner and it is this quality that will eventually bring tourists in.I think he makes a lot of sense, don’t you? More than that, it is this original, liveable Penang for ordinary people that has endeared itself to Penangites, other Malaysians and tourists for generations. Not the highways, “iconic towers” and the massive shopping malls. But the simple life-style: the charming streets of George Town, full of character, lined with majestic heritage trees… life on the slow-lane… public spaces for ordinary people such as the Esplanade promenade and the newly renovated hawker centre there… the historical shophouses, complete with peeling plaster… the old family-run businesses and coffee-shops offering hawker food – which draw people from all over the country and beyond… Ahh… the stuff of childhood memories and dreams. Once that is gone, it will be lost forever, as Singapore has found out too late. Is it too late to save Penang from marauding developers?
Just a reminder: Have you registered as a voter?
Umno state assembly member criticises PGCC project
This is an actual picture of the Turf Club land and the surrounding low-rise properties. (Photo credit: PGCC Campaign Group)
This is what it would look like with towers… gulp! The towers here are replicas of 37 existing towers from all over George Town transplanted to the Turf Club site (The wonders of image editing by the PGCC Campaign Group!)
This is what they showed you – view of George Town (image from the official PGCC launch booklet)
What they didn’t show you – the view with 37 towers added in (Image editing: PGCC Campaign Group)
It is not just the PGCC Campaign Group and ordinary Penangites who are critical of the Penang Global City Centre project. Now, the Umno state assembly member from Bertam, Datuk Hilmi Abdul Rashid says the project is too costly. “If it is too expensive, no locals or companies will be able to afford any of the commercial lots. In the end, the project will fail because there will be no buyers, or no tenants if the lots are leased out at a very high rate,” he was quoted as saying in theSun (27 November 2007).He said five years down the road, the government may have to step in to save the project and force government agencies and departments to take up lots there. (Like they did for Komtar?) “I am not against development as we need investments to generate income but we must monitor the investments to ensure they are not at the expense of the public,” he said.Wise words, Hilmi. Of course, there is also the need to save the green lung that is the Turf Club land and ideally turn it into a Penang state park as a legacy for future generations. Now that would be really zero carbon and sooooo eco-friendly!
Look who’s breathing down Patrick’s neck…
Priceless moment: A bemused Patrick Lim, the developer of the Penang Global City Centre, turns to look at heritage conservationist Loh-Lim Lin Lee as she presents the PGCC Campaign Group’s grave concerns about his mega project during the Penang Local Government Consultative Forum on 23 November. On Patrick’s right is Nasrine Seraji, the PGCC master planner. Seated behind the pair are half a dozen activists and others critical of the PGCC, including environmentalist Gurmit Singh (in blue shirt) who mocked the proposal to put up wind turbines, pointing out that the country just doesn’t have enough wind for it to work. Lots of hot air, yes… but just not enough wind, sorry guys! (Photo credit: PHT)
One of the questions raised was: “Carbon-0 is really carbon off-setting or carbon trading, isn’t it? Buy carbon reduction projects elsewhere (and) leave all the carbon emissions of PGCC in Penang?”
Patrick replied, “I don’t know about the carbon off-setting you are talking about.”
But on page 19 of the glossy PGCC launch booklet, it is clearly stated:
After efforts to reduce energy requirements and maximize renewable energy sources are exhausted, carbon offsetting can neutralise the remaining emissions associated with the city to achieve carbon zero status.
Can Media Prima take on Malaysia Today and Malaysiakini?
Malaysian media giant grasps for Internet By Anil Netto PENANG – The media battle for Malaysian hearts and minds, pitting the government-controlled print and electronic media against critical Internet websites and blogs, is heating up in the run-up to general elections. Now, Malaysia’s largest private media conglomerate, Media Prima, has unveiled big investment plans to generate Internet content, a revenue diversification strategy aimed at getting a larger slice of the growing on-line advertising pie. For the full article, click here.
When human rights activists let their hair down…

The Aliran Singers re-united and in full flow!
Aliran turns 30: A heart-warming celebration of justice It was all so different from the official Merdeka celebrations, monopolised and dominated by members of the ruling coalition, recalls Anil Netto, of a night to remember. Full article Why not support the cause of human rights and justice by subscribing to Aliran Monthly, Malaysia’s leading independent English-language current affairs journal.Penang Global City Centre: Spot the difference!
This is the PGCC (based on Equine’s model of the 38 towers) (Patrick Lim is on the right)
And this isn’t? (The PGCC campaign group’s model of the PGCC which PGCC master planner Nasrine Seraji says is based on a “misunderstanding of the masterplan”) (photo credit: Sin Chew from Nasrine’s powerpoint presentation)
Err, pardon me… but what is the difference between the two?Bersih and Hindraf gatherings: An awakening of the marginalised
Asean embraces a rogue regime while inking a Charter for Big Business
No need for institutional reform? You gotta be kidding!
Beware those who want to hijack Malaysia’s People Power movement
In a parting shot, Thierry Rommel, the European ambassador who left his post on Tuesday, castigated the Malaysian government for its deplorable human rights record and the “discriminatory” New Economic Policy (NEP).
News reports quoted Rommel as saying the executive in Malaysia is “all-powerful and not accountable” while the judiciary remains beholden to the executive because the prime minister directly makes the appointments. He said Umno runs the country like its own backyard and that the Malaysia was “a one-party state”.
“The parliament (is) useless. No fair elections, no freedoms. Police is unaccountable. Internal checks and balances? Forget it. So where do you find characteristics that (represent) democracy?”
Malaysians struggling for greater democracy, who marched in the tens of thousands on 10 November, might be forgiven for thinking that they had found an influential ally in Rommel and the European Union.
Big mistake. Although most of Rommel’s remarks ring true, they must be seen in the context of the forthcoming negotiations for the EU-Asean FTA which begins next year. With this FTA, the EU hopes to prise open the Asean market for unfettered access by European multinational corporations. This will no doubt also accelerate the neo-liberal agenda across the region.
“Iconic towers” or eyesores?
If our experience with “iconic towers” in Penang is any indication, then look out for what could happen with other towers in the pipeline.
Thanks to a reader for bringing these to my attention:
Sad-looking Komtar: Why has its viewing gallery become a store?
And here’s a blocked fire-escape
Cardboard on the windows of the keris-shaped Menara Umno (supposed to be another architectural masterpiece). Innovative way to reduce heat and cut air-con emissions, eh?
So if we have more “iconic towers”, do you really think our habits will improve? While on the subject of high-rise towers, a reader wrote this from England:England’s problems are in the areas where there is high unemployment due to collapsed industries, steel shipbuilding, coal – where entire towns were employed in one industry. Also areas where many immigrant communities have settled – and worked hard to look after their families… It’s also in the areas were decent housing (albeit ramshackle) have been replaced with emotionless high-rise towers, set in dry hard landscapes – enough to send anyone around the bend. All sounds rather too familiar? Give Malaysia 20 years and you’ll see the same – unless there is some very sound social management. I was once talking to (someone in Malaysia) and described the social problems created by high-rise buildings. “Oh, not in Asia,” he said. Want to bet? The (consequences could be) worse in Asia where family and social connections are so very important and high-rise buildings will destroy them.
“No matter the regime’s physical power, in the end they can’t stop the people”
“I am really not fond of that expression,” she replied rather sternly. “People have been on the streets. That’s not a stalemate. Ethnic people, like the Karen, are fighting back. That’s not a stalemate. The defiance is there in people’s lives, day after day. You know, even when things seem still on the surface, there’s always movement underneath. It’s like a frozen lake; and beneath our lake, we are progressing, bit by bit.”Similarly, 10 November in Malaysia was not a stalemate. Malaysians have conquered their fear. There is a sense of defiance – witnessed when tens of thousands of good-natured, peaceful, justice-loving Malaysians waved defiantly at helicopters hovering overhead and at sullen-faced riot police seated in red trucks passing menacingly by. When they were confronted by a phalanx of riot police, they stood their ground and refused to blink. Instead, it is the oligarchic political elites who now fear the people on the move, who tremble in anticipation of their next move. Yes, we are progressing, bit by bit. Read John Pilger’s full piece here.
50,000 Malaysians defy ban to demand electoral reforms
Sea of yellow: They came in their thousands to get their point across – Photo credit: Seng Keat Tan
So the chief of police puts the turnout at 4,000 in a report tucked away on page 8 of The Star. Interesting! But then he was probably referring to the crowd at Masjid Jamek alone, where police fired water cannons, dousing the protesters with chemically laced liquid. The way The Star reported it made it sound as if 4,000 was the total turnout, although it did add later that “thousands” had turned up at various spots. If it was really 4,000, why did they need two (or was it three) helicopters to monitor the crowd? My estimate of the total turnout – and that was the rough consensus among those at the scene at various points – was 50,000. Still, the actual turnout is beside the point. The real story was the fact that tens of thousands of Malaysians had come out – despite repeated warnings and threats of arrest – to defy a ban and put across their demand for electoral reforms, loudly and clearly. I was proud to be a Malaysian among the good natured and peaceful crowd that afternoon. As for the mainstream media coverage, it was pathetic. I woke up this morning expecting it to be front page news. After all, news of the protest gathering had flashed across the globe yesterday. But when I saw the front page of The Sunday Star today… zilch, nada, nothing…. Was this for real? It seemed as if I must have been on a different planet. It was only reported half-heartedly on page 8. Tens of thousands of people had brought Kuala Lumpur to a virtual standstill the day before and… Page 8! Disgusting coverage. But then again, what else can we expect from our castrated mainstream media? Meanwhile, check out Aliran president P Ramakrishnan’s statement here. RIGHTS-MALAYSIA: Rally Defies Police Ban to Demand Poll Reforms By Anil Netto KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 10 (IPS) – Tens of thousands of people defied riot police, water cannon and pouring rain to march through the capital city, on Saturday, to demand electoral and other reforms and deliver a strong rebuff to Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi. On Friday Badawi had issued a stern warning that he would brook no challenge to his rule and officials said anybody around Dataran Merdeka (Independence Square), the planned venue of the protest gathering, would be arrested. That made the turnout of over 50,000 people, sloshing through muddy grass verges by the highway, all the more impressive as they engaged in a cat-and-mouse game with police armed with water cannons and batons. Full articlePenang Global City Centre: Activists step up campaign
And so the PGCC PR battle begins…
The PGCC developer has taken its road-show to Queensbay Mall
Looks like the PR battle has begun. The Penang Global City Centre developer is on a road show promoting its project in Queensbay Mall and Gurney Plaza in Penang. Just received in the email the following hypothetical conversation between the pro-PGCC lobby and a member of the public. Would have been hilarious if there wasn’t a ring (more like alarm bells) of truth about the details of the project. Though the conversation below is probably hypothetical, I am told that those promoting the project do not have all the answers when questioned by people who are more in touch with what the plan actually entails. Makes you wonder if they really believe what they are being paid to promote.Milan and Penang: Trams vs Monorail/PORR/PGCC
Greetings from Milan! I am here presenting a paper at a conference.
Walking around the city, I must say I have been impressed with Milan’s excellent network of underground trains, trams (old and modern), buses and taxies – though locals tell me there is still room for improvement.
But first, what’s this? Someone alerted me to a Penang monorail route map posted on Wikipedia. I am not sure who posted that entry:
“The Penang Monorail is a future monorail line to be constructed under the Ninth Malaysia Plan and Northern Corridor Economic Region (NCER). It will be located on Penang Island. Two lines will be built, with possible extensions to Province Wellesley in the future. The 37km system is expected to cost RM 1.1 billion. “The names of all the stations on the monorail are still mostly unknown, although the main stops are confirmed. The Red Line will run between Tanjung Tokong and the Penang International Airport via Scotland Road, Jalan Air Itam and the Penang State Mosque. The Green Line will run between Paya Terubong and Weld Quay Terminal, via Jalan Air Itam, Jalan Dato’ Keramat, and Komtar. The interchange will be situated at Jalan Air Itam.”
“It is people like Hishamudin who should be heading the judiciary”
It’s a PGCC jungle out there, folks!
Here is one guy’s impression of what the PGCC would look like from Komtar. KL Dude has had a go on photo editor with the earlier picture of the PGCC Twin Towers posted on this blog; only this time he has actually added the 38 towers in front of those “iconic” towers. Perhaps his impression is not really to scale, but you get the idea… It’s a (concrete) jungle out there, folks! 









