Home Blog Page 554

A new movement springs to life as Thaipusam devotees shun Batu Caves, throng temples elsewhere

Update – 8.45 pm, Penang: Some 2,000 Hindu Malaysians, clad in the orange of Makkal Sakthi, are on the streets, chanting, “Hindraf! Hindraf! Long live Hindraf!”

It’s confirmed: The boycott of Batu Caves for the Thaipusam festival has been a success. Tens – perhaps hundreds – of thousands of Hindu Malaysian devotees have boycotted Batu Caves – which experienced at least a 30 per cent drop in attendance. They have instead turned to temples elsewhere for the annual Thaipusam festival.

In the process, a new movement – Makkal Sakthi (People Power) closely associated with support for Hindraf – has sprung to life, flexing its muscles in numbers. What makes it astonishing is that there is no organised structure or secretariat behind the movement, made up largely of marginalised Indian Malaysians. It was instead just ordinary people sending out mobile phone text messages, asking people to stay away from Batu Caves and instead go to other temples.

The implications are profound. It represents a de-coupling of popular religous devotion from the vested interests of the political-religious nexus. Put differently, it is indicative of a marginalised community no longer trusting a major temple authority because of its perceived close links to the ruling political elite and its perceived betrayal of the legitimate interests of the community. The adherents of the religion no longer want anything to do with those religious officials who are in cohorts with political masters who have already lost much of their political – and now religious – legitimacy.

The boycott has blown apart any attempt by Samy Vellu and the mainstream media to equate the attendance at a religious festival in Batu Caves with support for the MIC/BN. Clearly, the attempt to tie the MIC and Samy Vellu’s political legitimacy to the turnout at a religious festival – as if the devotees were there to pay homage to them – has failed miserably.

A couple of eye-witnesses who visited Batu Caves this morning told me that the turnout for the Thaipusam festival early this morning was distinctly smaller.

Remember, this is despite Thaipusam now being a public holiday in KL from this year. One would have expected a bigger turnout with people having the day off there.

One source told me that he felt the turnout was about 30 per cent lower.

A second source told me that the drop exceeded 30 per cent but not as much as half. She told me that during the same time (early morning) last year, the entrance to the Batu Caves temple premises was jammed. But not today.

A third source told me that a climb that would normally take 3-4 hours to complete – inching one’s way up the steps leading to the temple at the top and back – this time took only an hour.

Update (24 January): Malaysiakini and theSun both confirmed the smaller turnout at Batu Caves.

In contrast, Samy Vellu was reported as saying that the crowd was at least half a million people at the complex and a million the day before. “I have come to Thaipusam since I was 11 years old. I know the crowd. It is the same as before,” he told the press.

And what to make of this?

Call To Boycott Thaipusam In Batu Caves Ignored, One Million Turn Up

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 23 (Bernama) — Calls made to Hindus through short messaging service (SMS) to boycott Thaipusam festival in Batu Caves fizzled out as hundreds of thousands of devotees thronged the Sri Subramaniaswamy Temple here to pay their annual homage to Lord Muruga.

As of noon Wednesday, not less than 500,000 people, both locals and foreigners, flocked to the temple to fulfil their vows, MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said.

Oh, Bernama… Oh, Samy…

This morning, devotees could actually approach close to the altar with their paal kudam (milk pots) unhindered by the sea of humanity that would have obstructed their path in previous years. Many people had also turned up a couple of days earlier to fulfil their vows, said another source. And when they were asked for their chits (indicating they had paid about RM10) upon presentation of their paal kudam, many just glared back and refused to comply – which could be why the fee is reportedly only optional today.

A couple of stall owners grumbled that business had been poor. They had apparently paid RM2,500 for a small stall and RM5,000 for a bigger area. Even the eating stalls/areas were not crowded.

“It’s very noticeable that it is a much smaller crowd this year,” said my second contact. “The shop-owners told me business was affected.”

Tens of thousands of devotees have gone to other temples instead including the Pandamaran temple in Port Klang. When contacted at the scene, Charles Santiago of the Monitoring Globalisation research unit told me over the background din that the turnout was anything between 30,000 and 40,000. Update (24 January): Press reports say the total turnout over the entire celebration here reached 100,000, which is what another source told me. Now, this is remarkable when you consider that Port Klang is not normally associated with huge Thaipusam festivities.

Hindu devotees have also thronged smaller temples in Kuala Selangor, Klang and elsewhere in Selangor. One small temple in Klang, which in previous years would receive only about 30 paal kudam, this time received over a hundred milk pots, as some 3,000 devotees showed up.

Over in Penang, the Thaipusam crowds have been overwhelming, according to one contact at the scene. Near the race-course, a panthal (rest stop for those carrying kavadi) selling Makkal Sakthi (People Power) T-shirts and CDs has been enjoying brisk sales. The panthal is also displaying pictures of the Hindraf Five, detained under the ISA.

“The response has been fantastic,” said my contact. “Many young people are wearing the Makkal Sakthi T-shirts and greeting each other with cries of ‘Makkal Sakthi’. There was such a peaceful yet strong spirit of camaderie among those present. ” Hundreds are said to be wearing the yellowish-orange Makkal Sakthi attire. (I hope those in the Makkal Sakthi movement will extend their hands in solidarity with Malaysians of other ethnic groups and religious backgrounds who are also struggling for justice – and vice versa.)

He excitedly told me that the crowd this time was “100% more” than last year and he had seen buses from out of town. Update (24 January): Another witness confirmed that he had seen many buses, with a couple of people telling him there were 200-300 buses from out of town. One social activist told me there were many more people on the streets this year, compared to last year, when there was lots more space for people to move around. An academic at the scene also agreed the crowds were much bigger, with more people carrying milk pots. Strangely, theSun reported that the crowds in Penang were “much smaller” and traffic was “free flowing on roads leading to the temple.” Celebrations, the paper added, were “subdued”.

The official Thaipusam organisers in Penang had announced a ban on political parties setting up stalls along the road leading to the Waterfall Temple. This could be linked to SMS messages that are believed to have been circulating, asking people to boycott the MIC stall – which would have left the DAP stall as the centre of attention. In any case, one of my sources tells me there is now a “Karpal Singh panthal” outside his residence, which lies along the Jalan Utama route nearing the Waterfall Temple!

Similarly, Ipoh and Sungai Petani are believed to have experienced huge turnouts this year, but I await confirmation of this. Update (24 January): TheSun quoted a witness in Ipoh as saying the crowd was “unusually big this year”. She also heard it announced that the crowd was three times bigger than last year.

All said, it looks like the boycott call by Makkal Sakthi/Hindraf supporters has successfully diverted a large number of people away from Batu Caves. The boycott was called after many Indian Malaysians expressed unhappiness over the way the Batu Caves temple authorities handled the situation on 25 Nov 2007. Riot police arrived to spray water cannon and tear gas in the direction of the crowd gathered inside the Batu Cave temple premises in the early hours of dawn before the Hindraf rally later that day, sparking anger.

Share with me your Thaipusam experience in the “comments” below, okay… which temple you visited, what the atmosphere was like, the crowd size (was it bigger than last year or smaller?), the Makkal Sakthi spirit, what people were saying, anything of interest…

I wish all Hindu Malaysians blessings of peace and goodwill this Thaipusam.

Lingam inquiry: Memory loss epidemic spreads among witnesses

An impartial observer from Mars sitting in at the Lingam video inquiry would be forgiven for thinking that there is an outbreak of amnesia and dementia in Malaysia. Witnesses don’t seem to remember basic details. Why, Lingam was even unable to positively identify himself in the video, uttering the now legendary words, “It looks like me; it sounds like me.”

And when they appear to be incriminating themselves on the stand, they are very generously given time off to go and find a lawyer.

There is also considerable dilly-dallying in calling key witnesses such as Anwar Ibrahim, who first made the video public. And why does another potentially key witness, Lingam’s brother, have to literally beg to testify before the inquiry?

Anyway, I believe most Malaysians can see for themselves how the judiciary functioned during Mahathir’s administration. And it’s not a pretty picture. As my fellow correspondent with Inter Press Service, Baradan, observes below, Mahathir, who throughout his 22-year tenure managed to avoid being scrutinised in court, has well and truly exposed himself for the world to see.

POLITICS-MALAYSIA: Hearing Exposes Mahathir, His Corrupt Times
By Baradan Kuppusamy


KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 22 (IPS) – A public hearing into corruption in the higher judiciary is giving Malaysians a rare peep into the way top judges were appointed, demoted or promoted during the tenure of former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad.

The revelations are offering hope to lawyers, judges and civil society leaders that, for the first time in three decades, a cleanup of the judiciary is possible. Full story

The truth about Palestine: Occupation

Many of us tend to think that Palestine is a “Muslim issue”. But it is not. Do you know, for instance, that Bethlehem, the birth-place of Jesus Christ, lies in Palestinian territory? In any case, it shouldn’t matter what religion the Palestinians are.

It is a question of humanity and basic justice. A question of Occupation: 60 years since the Nakba.

If you want to know the real situation in Palestine, check out this documentary by award-winning journalist John Pilger – Palestine is still the issue (2002):

John Pilger returns to the Occupied Teritories of the West Bank and Gaza where he filmed a documentary with the same title, about the same issues, in 1974. He finds the basic problems unchanged: a desperate, destitute people whose homeland is illegally occupied by the world’s fourth biggest military power. He hears extraordinary stories from Palestinians, though most of his interviews are with Israelis whose voices are seldom heard, including the remarkable witness of a man who lost his daughter in a suicide bombing. This film was nominated for a BAFTA, a British Academy Award.

Meanwhile, amidst widespread indifference to the siege of the Gaza Strip, the UN has warned that its food aid to about 860,000 residents will have to be suspended within days if Israel’s blockade continues. Check out Glasgow-based John Hilley’s revealing write-up of Israel’s friendly network even as he demands to know why the major powers are “standing idly-by while a crisis siege in Gaza continues to inflict death and suffering on innocent people”.

Enticing Hindu Malaysian voters with Thaipusam holiday

Predictably, the PM has extended the Thaipusam public holiday to KL and Putrajaya. (Check out this revealing eye-witness account of the MIC-gathering tonight.) All I can say is that they must be desperate to win back support from Indian Malaysian voters, many of whom are sympathetic with Hindraf or have vowed to vote for the opposition this time. I believe many thinking Indian Malaysians will dismiss the Thaipusam holiday announcement as an election ploy – and see it as a sign that polls are around the corner.

Another clear indication of impending polls is that the BN’s election campaign over the electronic and print mass media – which it mostly controls – has already begun. (The Malaysian Election Media Monitoring team will soon begin posting its observations on a blog; so watch out for that.) The Star’s Wong Chun Wai, for instance, writes that surveys have identified three issues that voters will find most important:

While many recent scandals, trials and demonstrations have made the headlines, it is the three main issues of inflation, crime and foreigners that affect ordinary voters the most.

FORGET street protests, forget detention without trials, forget VK Lingam and certainly, forget any sex DVD that involves a politician. These may make good reading and good sound bites at ceramahs but the three main issues that affect ordinary voters the most are inflation, crime and foreigners.

So we can expect the mainstream media to bang on these three issues ahead of the elections – and that is precisely what The Sunday Star has done with its headline announcing official moves to cut the number of migrant workers in the country.

Wong thinks that voters are not interested in political and economic marginalisation, democratic rights and integrity in democratic institutions. He fails to see that all these issues are inter-connected. For instance, the marginalisation of public views and the lack of democratic space for discussion and debate and protest has led to an inability to tackle the root causes of inflation, crime and exploitation of migrant labour. No wonder we are unable to come up with real solutions and alternative policies to resolve these issues. For all we know, the damage to the institution of the police, as highlighted in the Royal Commission’s report may be hindering its work in fighting crime. Or the economic marginalisation and sense of alienation among significant segments of the population could very well be contributing to the higher crime rate.

Wong instead conveniently pins part of the blame for rising crime on migrant workers:

Another contributing factor to crime, where Malaysians are concerned, is the large number of foreigners. Malaysians are upset, if not angry, at the poor enforcement of the police coastguards in stopping the influx of foreigners.

Such irresponsible journalism merely feeds the xenophobic prejudice of many narrow-minded Malaysians, who believe that more foreigners = more crime. Come on, are foreigners any more likely to commit crime than Malaysians? Where’s the evidence to support that?

Meanwhile, here’s a piece I wrote for Asia Times, discussing the reasons Abdullah may have for calling a general election well before it is due:

Abdullah’s finger on Malaysia’s election trigger

By Anil Netto

PENANG – Malaysia’s political parties, including the ruling United Malays National Organization (UMNO), are gearing up for snap polls, widely expected to be held in March though the government is not legally required to dissolve parliament and hold general elections until May 2009.

So then why would Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi’s government opt to hold elections well before they are due? Full article

We believe in one God/Allah

Just came across this verse from the Qur’an (29:46), which I think speaks for itself:

وَلَا تُجَادِلُوا أَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ إِلَّا بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ إِلَّا الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا مِنْهُمْ وَقُولُوا آمَنَّا بِالَّذِي أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَأُنزِلَ

إِلَيْكُمْ وَإِلَهُنَا وَإِلَهُكُمْ وَاحِدٌ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ

Wala tujadiloo ahla alkitabi illa biallatee hiya ahsanu illa allatheena thalamoo minhum waqooloo amanna biallathee onzila ilayna waonzila ilaykum wailahuna wailahukum wahidun wanahnu lahu muslimoona

And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, except with means better (than mere disputation), unless it be with those of them who inflict wrong (and injury): but say, “We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one; and it is to Him we bow (in Islam).”

(English rendition by Abdullah Yusuf Ali)

Major blow for Patrick Lim, Equine, as People Power stalls PGCC project

Who says that ordinary people can’t make a difference?

In the end, it took 2,500 postcards, 500 emails and a concerted civil society campaign to convince Penang Chief Minister Koh Tsu Koon that it would be politically costly for the government to proceed with this project.

It is a fact that many Penangites and all those who care for Penang were furious about the RM25 billion ringgit Penang Global City Centre project, which threatened to choke the streets and destroy a precious vast green space.

Koh reportedly issued a directive to the Penang Island Municipal Council (MPPP) on Monday, 14 January to return the planning application to the developer, who would have to revise the plan before it could be approved. The project had been launched last September by Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi, who, back then, urged the state government to see to it that all approvals were expedited.

So Abdullah is not going to be happy – but perhaps he himself had been misled about the real nature of the project with its 40 high-rise towers. (Only the two infamous “iconic towers” were shown at the launch.)

Koh’s announcement means the project is now effectively stalled for at least a year – that’s how long the whole rigmarole of preparing a new plan and getting it approved will take. It means more time for the PGCC Campaign Group to strategise and mobilise more Penangites. It also means more financial costs for Equine’s Patrick Lim in holding on to an unproductive investment (though granted, Patrick’s initial financial outlay may not have been much and he already has made a huge revaluation profit following the conversion of land use to “mixed development”).

It’s amazing what People Power – and, oh yes, a general election around the corner – can do!

According to Koh, the developer would have to address the following issues, as reported in theSun:

* The proposed density without taking into account the 22ha of hill land (existing MPPP’s guidelines for the Jesselton and surrounding area is six units per acre with a height control of two-storeys. PGCC’s proposal is 36 units per acre inclusive of hill land and 54 units per acre excluding hill land);
* The area nearest to Jesselton Heights must only be low density development and only bungalows must be built (the developer has proposed to build almost 7,000 luxury units in 38 towers, including two iconic towers, but there are no provisions for bungalows); and
* The developer must fulfill the affordable housing policy which is insufficient and has not been included in the original development plan (The developer had planned to improve the six existing blocks of flats in Rifle Range and also build 1,334 low-medium cost units to fulfil its obligations on a 4.5ha MPPP-owned land on Rifle Range).

“These are the concerns which need to be address in addition to other concerns for traffic, social impact and others,” said Koh said after launching the state level integrity month in Dewan Millenium in Kepala Batas today.

For now, the PGCC Campaign Group is celebrating a partial victory. Why partial? Because the project has merely been stalled and not cancelled outright.

Nobody knows what will happen after the general election. Will the Prime Minister brush aside the Penang state government’s reservations and bull-doze this project through – seeing that it is supposed to be one of the so-called “high-impact” projects in the Northern Corridor?

Though the Penang Chief Minister must be given some credit for throwing a spanner in the PGCC works – even at the risk of upsetting his political masters in Putrajaya – he was not entirely convincing. One reporter told me that when Koh was asked if the government would insist on a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (which would require public participation), he did not give a straight answer and instead waffled on about the KLCC. Why can’t politicians give a straight answer? Just say “yes” or “no”, for crying out loud!

Still, the damage to the PGCC has been done. If there is one thing that investors, property buyers and financial backers hate most it is uncertainty, controversy and public opposition swirling around a major project. And there is plenty of that swirling around the PGCC.

Koh must now make public the recommendations of the MPPP’s building and planning sub-committee which, from what I hear, wanted radical amendments to the developer’s plan. These recommendations probably include a vast reduction in maximum height and density for much of the site and perhaps even a call for a detailed EIA. I gather the recommendations were unanimous, with even the Umno reps supporting them. (As one Gerakan insider told me, Patrick is believed to have “antagonised” even some of the Umno folks in the state.)

Armed with the recommendations of the sub-committee, which met last Wednesday (9 January), and the widespread opposition to PGCC in the state, Koh may have felt emboldened to go public. On Thursday (17 January), he told the press about his order to the MPPP on Monday (14 January) to reduce the scale of the project. He thus preempted the MPPP’s full council meeting scheduled for today (18 January). He must have received a fright when he heard DAP leader Lim Guan Eng – his party is mounting a strong challenge in Penang in the coming election – criticising the PGCC in comments reported in theSun on Monday.

Incidentally, Patrick Lim and his PGCC master planner Nasrine Seraji were in town today attending an IEM seminar. Someone who met Patrick said he put on a brave front, appeared cordial and expressed willingness to comply with any changes required. Sources also told me Nasrine must have been deflated for she did not put up much of a defence of the PGCC in her presentation unlike, on a previous occasion, at the Penang Local Council Consultative Forum, where she tried to justify the project. This time, I was told, she said that the present design of the PGCC was not the final one, so don’t just look at that. But when someone pointed out that the plans submitted for approval were based on the present design, she did not respond.

Someone else who attended the seminar provided a slightly different take:

Seraji, brought in again by PL, who had expected MPPP to approve PGCC’s planning application on the same day, was already well prepared with her powerpoints, but with CM’s announcement, was not sure how she should present her case for PGCC. At the end, I could sense that she just muddled through with PGCC’s ‘layers’ … appealing for us Penangites to try and appreciate her green efforts on this PGCC project. In short, she was wrong-footed upon landing in Penang the night before, and (perhaps) didn’t have any time to ponder how to switch her presentation.

Anyway, this is the official position of the PGCC Campaign Group, which was emailed to me:

We consider the initial process of planning submission by Abad Naluri to be seriously flawed by the fact that the DOE had allowed the plan to go through to the MPPP without even requiring a detailed EIA report. This is clearly an abuse of their discretionary powers to ask for this in a project of such massive scale.

The other omission was the failure of the State Government to draw up a ‘local plan’ of the area that would have been subject to public scrutiny and comment before approval; this would then provide a suitable benchmark against which the PGCC plans could be judged.

We welcome the CM’s directive to the MPPP to hold back the approval pending amendments but we regard these two processes mentioned above to be essential to ensure that the amended planning submission would be legal and properly accountable to the public.

We would urge the CM, the DOE and the MPPP to strictly follow this in considering their renewed submission.

Dr S P Choong,
On behalf of the PGCC Campaign Group

So it is clear what is required at the minimum: a detailed EIA (with public participation) and a local plan.

I believe what many Penangites would like is for the whole area to be turned into a Penang State Park. In fact, the environment – and the lack of open green recreational spaces – is poised to become a major election issue in Penang. Residents in Koh’s own neighbourhood, Tanjong Bunga, for instance, are upset about high-rise towers, tree- and hill-cutting and projects right on the edge of the water-front and even encroaching into the sea!

Clever Koh may think that, by making his announcement when he did, he has taken the wind out of the anti-PGCC campaign’s sails, which have been flapping furiously ahead of the general election.

Don’t count on it. The PGCC Campaign Group leaders have told me that they are not going to let down their guard.

One member of the PGCC Campaign Group warned,

“As they say, however, the opera ain’t over till the fat lady sings! This new mood among the authorities may only last until after the election. Keep their feet to the fire. Don’t remove your car sticker, encourage others to display car stickers and sign the online petition. Spread the word.”

Another reaction:

…this is only a small but significant tactical victory, but the fight continues. I fully expect PL to come back with another proposal that may be even more difficult to beat, seeing that it will be after the election, the biggest factor in our favour this round.

… this victory will, I hope, show to the doubters and fence-sitters that we can make a difference, if we speak out together with a loud voice. Perhaps with a supportive, empowered and emboldened public a tough fight will be less difficult.

For now, at least, the dream of a Penang State Park on the Turf Club site lives on!

The torturous truth can be disturbing – even at the movies

Sometimes, when you want to get away from it all, you head to the cinema and escape into a fantasy world. But once in a while, you come across a film that gets too close to reality for comfort. “Rendition” is one such movie – featuring a stellar cast of Academy Award winners, it is an excellent if profoundly disturbing portrait of torture in our world today.

The only quibble I have with the movie is that you don’t often find CIA officers – even those on their first assignments – suffering pangs of conscience in real life when confronted with gruesome torture. But then again, what do I know: there must be the odd CIA officer around with a conscience – which would make him/her, well, kinda odd.

Rendition is about the United States’ practice of exporting terror suspects to “friendly nations” – and even not-so-friendly nations like Syria – who would gladly do the torturing by proxy, hidden from public scrutiny. (The movie itself doesn’t specify in which Middle-Eastern country the story is set.) This enables the US adminstration to say, as Meryl Streep’s character (the CIA boss) insists indignantly, “America does not torture!” Yes, and I am Tiger Woods.

The twist at the end got a bit confusing: you had to try and connect the different time sequences of the parallel sub-plots from the present to the past and back. Perhaps a bit too clever.

That said, this film is so thought-provoking that I found myself with only half a dozen other patrons at the cineplex last night. Typical of Malaysians, I suppose, who like their cinematic action fast and furious or soppy and romantic and enchanting or whatever… as long as it bears no resemblance to reality!

“Rendition” is a damning indictment of torture and detention without trial. There is no attempt to preach about the evils of torture, which paradoxically makes the movie even more powerful. Instead, you get a glimpse into the hidden world of dungeons and torture – and then you decide whether you think torture (or whatever they call it) is acceptable. Catch this movie if you can.

Check out Robert Fisk’s review:

Warning… this film could make you angry

By Robert Fisk

11/05/07 “The Independent” — – At university, we male students used to say that it was impossible to take a beautiful young woman to the cinema and concentrate on the film. But in Canada, I’ve at last proved this to be untrue. Familiar with the Middle East and its abuses – and with the vicious policies of George Bush – we both sat absorbed by Rendition, Gavin Hood’s powerful, appalling testimony of the torture of a “terrorist suspect” in an unidentified Arab capital after he was shipped there by CIA thugs in Washington. Read more

MPPP must rise to the occasion this Friday and reject PGCC

Will they or won’t they? Throw a spanner into the PGCC works, that is.

The full council of the Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) will sit on Friday, 18 January 2007 2008 in a meeting that could very well decide the fate of the Penang Global City Centre project.

They will listen to the recommendations of the sub-committee on building and planning. The sub-committee deliberated on the PGCC at length during a meeting last Wednesday, 9 January.

At issue is the high density of the project and whether 40-storey towers should be allowed so close to residential areas.

Also, look out for the Council’s recommendation on whether a detailed EIA is needed. (Of course, it is needed!)

What I would really like the full council to do is to stop the PGCC project in its tracks and turn the land into a Penang State Park for the benefit of future generations. I am sure Penangites would welcome such a decision!

In case you need any reminding, Councillors, there is a general election coming up – and Penangites will be watching very closely. Know what I mean? The fate of your political masters hangs in the balance.

PGCC: DOE tries to get away with only preliminary EIA

I hear that the Department of the Environment quietly approved a preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment of the Penang Global City Centre (PGCC) project way back on 2 March 2007.

A “one-stop centre” meeting approved the preliminary EIA, subject to various conditions (e.g. flood control, air quality, noise pollution, waste disposal) after technical issues were discussed. The EIA apparently considered the impact of pollution, pollution control measures and the management and oversight of the environment.

Shockingly, however, a traffic impact study was deemed to be outside the scope of the preliminary EIA; instead, traffic apparently falls under the jurisdiction of the Penang Municipal Council (MPPP).

It is also surprising that the preliminary EIA has not been widely circulated and publicised, especially since it has already been approved.

From what I understand, the DOE has the discretion to insist on a detailed EIA for projects that are likely to have a significant impact on the environment. Surely, a project of the magnitude of the PGCC, which covers more than 100 hectares, would have a major impact on the environment in terms of the loss of a vast green space, increased pollution and traffic congestion.

Unlike a preliminary EIA, a detailed EIA would require substantial public participation: the public would be given an opportunity to air their views. So why hasn’t there been a detailed EIA? Why deny this right to the public?

With the general election around the corner – and Penang being a “front-line” state and all that – I wouldn’t be surprised if this becomes a major election issue.

So insist on a detailed EIA with widespread public participation.

Malaysian polls observers declare Uzbek “non-election” fair

So a six-man Malaysian election observer team, led by the Malaysian Election Commission deputy chairman, have declared the Uzbekistan elections “fair” even though critics have described it as a “non-election”.

Remember, the Uzbekistan government is notorious for torturing dissidents and even putting them in boiling pots.

Check out this analysis:

Murray began receiving photographs and other evidence from victims’ families that the Uzbek government was engaging in brutal torture techniques as part of its interrogation of dissidents. One corpse had been beaten around the neck and jaw, and boiled alive. There was a line across his chest, under which it was scalded. Boiled like a lobster.

Gee, I wonder why they invited the Malaysian Election Commission deputy chairman as an observer… I hope the Election Commission in Malaysia won’t reciprocate and invite the Uzbek election commissioners as observers in our general election.

Check out this Bernama report:

Uzbekistan Election Fair, Say Malaysian Observers

By V. Sankara

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 4 (Bernama) — Despite several criticisms made by the West, Malaysian observers who witnessed Uzbekistan’s presidential election on Dec 23 found it to be democratic, transparent, peaceful and fair.

Election Commission (EC) deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar who headed a six-man Malaysian observer team to monitor the election said international observers were given the freedom to choose the locations in making their observations.

The election, he said was conducted in 14 regions of Uzbekistan with 8,250 polling centres and that some 16 million people out of its 26 million population were eligible to vote.

Wan Ahmad also said Malaysian observers were given qualified interpreters to communicate with the voters there.

“In this aspect, it was very easy to gather details from the voters,” he told Bernama.

Commenting on the ballot boxes, Wan Ahmad said transparent ballot boxes were used in the election.

“It was very easy to scrutinize since everything was transparent,” he said.

Now, contrast the Bernama report above with the Reuters/AlertNet report below:

Uzbekistan’s non-election
21 Dec 2007 13:05:00 GMT
Written by: Andrew Stroehlein
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author’s alone.

Political theatre doesn’t get any more absurd than the 23 December presidential election in Uzbekistan, where the incumbent front-runner is neither in office now nor allowed to run for another term — though Islam Karimov is supported by all three opposing candidates. There have been a few good online articles about it over the last couple days, though of course, the country’s information black hole will prevent Uzbeks from reading them. But never mind: they already know how ridiculous it all is.

Some major international news organisations such as the Associated Press will not be covering the election from the ground, because the regime denied them accreditation. The complete lack of free media inside the country doesn’t help much either. Still, there have been a few worthwhile pieces published if you dig around.

Reporting from Tashkent, Tony Halpin has an article in the Times with a title that says it all: “Torture, an iron fist and twisted logic set stage for Islam Karimov’s landslide victory”.

Inga Sikorskaya at IWPR examines the lack of competition in “Karimov’s Rivals Unite to Praise Him”. The other candidates — I’ll spare you their names as they don’t matter at all and will never be heard of again — “routinely start by singing the praises of incumbent president Islam Karimov.” In another piece, she notes how fake election observers are being deployed to cover the non-election.

So this is the election that our Malaysian observers have described as “democratic, transparent, peaceful and fair”. I guess they were referring to the transparent ballot boxes but in the process, they have missed the wood for the trees. Just like they have here.