Home Blog Page 482

Ceremony to launch Pokok Demokrasi square

I gather there’s going to be some sort of “Majlis Perasmian Tugu dan Pokok Demokrasi” at the site of the fabled Democracy Tree in Medan Istana across the road from the rear entrance to the Perak state government building in Ipoh at 10.00am today. It will be exactly one year after the historic 8 March 2008 general election.

More trees are expected to be planted around the Pokok Demokrasi to symbolise justice, freedom, etc

Nizar and members of his administration are expected to be present.

Meanwhile, blog reader Anna Brella has sent in some quotes on trees:

“The tree is more than first a seed, then a stem, then a living trunk, and then dead timber. The tree is a slow, enduring force straining to win the sky.” – Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, The Wisdom of the Sands, translated from French by Stuart Gilbert.

“The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.” – Nelson Henderson

Focus on substantive issues, not personalities

Who is this mysterious Andrew, who has been criticised by a few readers of this blog? Here, the academic-activist explains where he is coming from:

Let me clarify that I am first of all, a Penangite and a Malaysian who believes in democratic discourse. Thus, unlike some of those who have attacked me on a personal basis above (and previously in other posts), I am more interested in the substantive issues at hand. So, let’s focus on the discussion instead of personalities. Consequently, I see no reason why I should give anyone my IC number or my full name if I choose not to do so in my comments to Anil’s blog. This is my democratic choice just as I do not demand anyone to disclose their full identity if they criticise me. I would honestly prefer if we addressed the issues.

Hence, I find it disturbing here in Anil’s blog to read postings that reflect die-hard partisan positions towards those whom we disagree with. One would have hoped for better considering that many of us who post comments are from the educated middle-classes; the enlightened intelligentsia of our society if you please.

Odds and ends

Here are some links you might find interesting today:

Democracy under a tree

A message from DEMOCRACY TREE

I am just a tree, why not be like me..
I give shelter, and rest to all in need, you can see.
There’s shade under my branches, come and take your rest
You’ll know then, that I am simply Nature’s gift and I ….did my best.

Shakuntala, an anak Bangsa Malaysia who adores trees and spends time just staring at their beauty and generosity and who believes in the fusion of Nature with human activity.

Some people are saying the tree in question is a yellow flame tree. Can anyone verify this?

Continuing on the tree theme, I wrote the following for IPS:

It has already been dubbed “Pokok Demokrasi” or Democracy Tree and is set to enter the annals of folklore in Ipoh, capital city of Perak state.

In an open space beneath this 60-foot high rainforest tree and another lush mango tree nearby, the state legislative assembly of peninsular Malaysia’s second largest state held an emergency session Tuesday as a crowd of several hundred looked on.

Penang NGOs submit proposals to state gov’t

Lim Chong Eu once tried to “develop” Penang Hill while later, Koh Tsu Koon tried to pave the way for the development of the Turf Club land for the PGCC project.  In both cases, Penang civil society groups mobilised public opinion to “Save Penang Hill” and “Stop PGCC”.  Both proved to be costly errors, driven by corporate greed and the interests of develors. The rest, as they say, is history.

Himanshu Bhatt writes about the Penang Forum’s submission of civil society proposals and recommendations to the Penang state government. Will the state government heed the views of the activists?

This article appeared in theSun:

Ignore NGOs at your peril

LAST Saturday, at a private meeting in the chief minister’s office, the Pakatan Rakyat government of Penang was handed a stack of working papers by a motley gathering of NGOs. The reports, drawn up by independent working groups, were made as part of a “People’s Forum”, a community-based initiative of as many interest groups as one could imagine popping up in Penang, a former “crown jewel” of Gerakan.

How much of approved FDI is actually coming?

Projects approved by state

State20082007
No Domestic Invest (RM mill)Foreign Invest (RM mill)Total Investment (RM mill)No Domestic Invest (RM mill )Foreign Invest (RM mill) Total Investment (RM mill )
Sarawak391988.313180.515168.923403631.41034.5
Selangor3022866.29004.711870.93186989.74191.711181.5
Johor1732315.19396.611711.71882495.46747.49242.8
Penang1515068.75087.610156.31341625.23143.44768.7
Melaka41182.33452.23634.5381618.52219.23837.7
Perak50696.82433.2313059651.71382.92034.6
Kedah46288.12279.32567.3467856.76133.613990.2
N Sembilan26821294.81115.840493.62181.92675.6
Pahang231017.763.11080.728406.91156.91563.8
T’ganu9636.8355.5992.3112772.23391.16163.2
Sabah40620.6343.8964.4411080.92176.73257.5
Perlis263.3107170.327.107.1
KL129423.8117.81252.839.692.4
Kelantan317.66683.6952.630.182.7
Labuan29.810.720.5
Total91916686.246098.86278594926506.333425.959932.2

Source: MIDA

If you consider that RM17.4 billion is for foreign investments in the electronics sector (think Penang and Selangor) and RM20.4 billion for foreign investments in basic metal products (think aluminium smelters in Sarawak), then you begin to wonder how many of these approved projects will actually materialise.

The global electronics sector is in deep trouble; so the Penang government shouldn’t rely on these figures for comfort this year. The figures for Sarawak include the proposed aluminium smelter (notice the sharp jump from 2007), which is nowhere near to being implemented – though that would be a blessing given the environmental implications.

Speaker’s lawyers making another bid

The Speaker’s lawyers (from left): Chan Kok Keong, Augustine Anthony, Tommy Thomas, and Phillip Koh Tong Ngee Photo by KK

V Sivakumar’s lawyers are going back to court again in another attempt to represent the Speaker, says my source in Ipoh after a press conference held by the lawyers.

Yesterday, the court ruled that only the state legal adviser could represent the Speaker.

This time the lawyers will argue that under Article 132 (3) of the Federal Constitution, the Speaker is not part of the public services, and therefore he should be allowed to engage private lawyers.

Fed gov’t interested in helping cronies: Water Panel

The Selangor government’s Water Review Panel has accused federal Water Minister Shaziman Abu Mansor of being more interested in protecting the private interests of businessmen rather than the Selangor and KL public.

In a Berita Harian interview yesterday, Sharizan had given two reasons for wanting to speed up the restructuring of the Selangor water industry:

  • to take over the water concessionaires’ assets by 31 March and avert a water tariff hike and
  • to assist the concession companies in bearing the costs of borrowings and bonds that they currently cannot afford.

In contrast, the Water Review Panel stressed in a statement that there would be no increase in tariffs should the Selangor government take over the assets.

MACC officers question Speaker’s lawyer

A couple of MACC officers from Putrajaya turned up this afternoon to question Augustine Anthony, one of the five lawyers representing Perak Speaker V Sivakumar, a source in Ipoh informs me.

They questioned Augustine from 4.00pm to 4.40pm in Ipoh today.

Khalid explains S’gor water talks position

Selangor MB Khalid Ibrahim says the federal government recognised that its water privatisation policy had failed; so it introduced a restructuring of water management under which a federal body would take over the water assets and lease them back to the operators in the various states.

In Selangor, the state government owns about 70 per cent of the water assets with the remainder held by private companies.  The assets owned by the  state are valued at RM9 billion. The state government values the private sector’s assets and imputed equity at RM5.7 billion. (The assets alone are valued at RM4.6 billion though the federal government has valued them at RM5.0 billion).