A mysterious trip to China

24
973

A few months ago, perhaps in April, a Penang government rep was seen checking out an autonomous rail rapid transit (ART) or trackless tram system in China. This option is believed to cost not more than one third (probably much less) than the cost of the elevated light rail system that Penang is set on acquiring at a staggering cost of “more than RM10bn”.

The state government should let us know what transpired and the outcome of the trip.

Even Sarawak is already studying the ART system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRwh2TzsDqY

But here in Penang, there is no serious attempt to look at alternatives to the elevated light rail. In fact, the state government’s own original transport masterplan consultants, Halcrow, had outlined a network of bus rapid transit and modern trams, which would be elevated along certain stretches.

But no, instead of modern trams, expensive elevated light rail was proposed by the project delivery consultants, who would earn 6% in fees. One of the arguments for elevated light rail is that it would not eat into existing road space, but that is not true. The pillars supporting the tracks alone would take up almost an entire lane of the road.

Some people are already so excited about ART (trackless trams) that they have even come up with a proposed route that would link mainland Penang to the island – unlike the elevated light rail, which would only be on Penang Island (from Komtar to the airport). The following suggested ART route map is circulating on social media:

A suggested ART route map that is being circulated online

Looks a lot more attractive than the single route elevated light rail that the state government is bent on pursuing at great cost to Penang and its environment, including the coastal ecology.

READ MORE:  Soil scientist: PIL tunnels will cut through three faultlines

The federal government should serious review the plan for such an expensive elevated light rail system in Penang and instead opt for cheaper, more efficient options, perhaps first improving and expanding our existing bus and ferry system (still only four miserable ferries in operation at peak hours, compared to a dozen in the 1970s and 1980s).

Is a RM10bn elevated light rail system the best option for Penang?

In the second of a three-part series, Lim Mah Hui and Ahmad Hilmy explain why trackless trams are a better, cheaper, faster option than an elevated light rail transit system.

A fully-integrated public transport system based on the modification of the Halcrow Plan can be implemented at less than RM10bn in place of the overblown RM46bn “PTMP”.

Replacing elevated light rail with trackless trams to save RM9bn

Penang Forum consistently demands and fully supports a good public transport system. The main question is, is the elevated light rail transit (LRT) system the right choice?

After a town hall meeting in September 2018, where Penang Forum suggested that the Penang government explore replacing the LRT with autonomous rail transit (ART), the government sent a delegation to China in early 2019 to study its ART system.

To date, the public has been kept in the dark as to the findings of this study mission.

We propose that the government should at the least give the public an account of the objectives of such trips, what was learned and adopted, what was not and why. What was the cost? We await their report.

Meanwhile, the Sarawak government also sent a delegation to study the ART and has announced its intention of adopting this new technology.

READ MORE:  Penang transport masterplan: Back to the drawing board

Nevertheless, scholars have also visited China to study the ART. Among the most prominent is Peter Newman, who won the 2018 Western Australia Scientist of the Year award and has studied train systems for over 40 years.

Newman had this to say: “I went to China to check out the CRRC trackless tram (ART). I came back convinced it’s a transformative transit technology.”

The ART is cheaper, with researchers estimating construction costs at A$6m (RM17m) to A$8 million (RM22m) per kilometre for each set of three cars plus a station.

This is a fraction of the elevated LRT, which costs at least A$50m (RM141m) per kilometre. Penang’s elevated LRT is estimated to cost RM220m per kilometre, ie 10 times more expensive than an ART.

The ART is better, more flexible and with the same, if not higher, carrying capacity. The standard ART system is three carriages, which can carry 300 people. It can take five carriages and 500 people if needed.

The ART’s carrying capacity is estimated at 12,000-30,000 people per hour, per kilometre on a single 50km/h lane – higher than the LRT, which can carry 10,000-20,000 people per hour.

The ART is much faster to install since no tracks are needed. It operates on an autonomous optical guidance system with GPS and Lidar technologies along invisible tracks.

Trackless trams avoid the worst features of an elevated LRT system – disruption and cost. It would take an estimated six to seven years to build the Penang LRT, causing major disruptions in the state.

According to Newman, ART lines can be painted literally over a weekend. It takes a few months to build the stations, not six years. Prefabricated stations can be installed.

READ MORE:  Klang Valley double-tracking to be reviewed; what about Penang mega projects?

The ART can travel quickly and smoothly. Newman was on an ART and witnessed kids running up and down the tram aisle while it was going at 70 km/h.

Australia is studying new ways of financing the ART, with private investors paying for land along the route, road preparations, construction of tram carriages and even operations in that corridor.

In Penang, the Bayan Lepas-FTZ area is densely populated. ART corridors will benefit the private sector.

In this regard, Penang can explore joint ventures with private investors to determine the stations and route, build and operate the ART system.

“This allows for more efficient use of the infrastructure, new sources of funding, a reduction in car dependency, and increase in economic growth and productivity,” says research assistant Sebastian Davies-Slate.

The table below compares the strengths and weakness of BRT, LRT and ART. Without doubt, the ART comes up on top.

Penang has a small but strong bus-building industry. Given that the ART technology is a cross between tram and bus, Penang should explore with China the possibility of technology transfer.

In light of all the above, the Penang government must justify why it is choosing the RM9.6bn elevated LRT over technology that is better, cheaper and faster. It cannot hide behind the excuse that LRT is elevated and does not take road space.

Conclusion: ART is better, cheaper and faster.

Cost savings: RM9bn.

Lim Mah Hui is a former professor, international banker and Penang Island City Councillor for six years. Ahmad Hilmy is a transport engineer who teaches at Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Please help to support this blog if you can.

Read the commenting guidlelines for this blog.

24
Join the conversation

avatar
2000
10 Comment threads
14 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
PipitSanilglissantiaWeiAnil Netto Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Lim Goh Poh
Guest
Lim Goh Poh

Simplicity and efficiency and punctuality of bus network deployed over island !

RapidPenang bigger buses on main roads, linked by another bus company running on mini electrical engines to reach out to housing estates and FTZ zones factories.

Ideal but not cash spinning way to the authority????

glissantia
Guest
glissantia

Mahathir first eliminated the many competing bus businesses. He in 1990s in KL, and others later in Putrajaya, helped to roll out fleets of good buses as replacement. Perhaps there was not enough commitment – as capital – from the “entrepreneurs”. Later we saw photos of a large numbers of these buses supposedly condemned at the depots. Perhaps the entrepreneurs were waiting for more handouts. This is similar to the situation in our major cash crops.

Pipit
Guest
Pipit

“Zakir is playing a dangerous role as an instigator. It would be best that he be returned to India. Because of him, the relationship between Malaysia and India is grim. We have a lot of other work to do,” Rais posted on his Twitter account.

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/08/14/rais-yatim-tells-putrajaya-send-zakir-naik-home-we-have-lots-of-other-work/1780582

Thumbs up if you agree.

Pipit
Guest
Pipit

Social activist Marina Mahathir is the latest to join the chorus condemning preacher Zakir Naik for calling on Chinese Malaysians to leave the country.

Marina’s tweet has attracted scores of replies, many of which urged her to advise her father Mahathir to deport the preacher.

https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/488027

tunglang
Guest
tunglang

Fugitive Zakir Naik, you are not welcomed here!
Go back to where you slithered from hissing instigations wherever you slither.
This one for you: Eruption – One Way Ticket 1978 (High Quality)

Pipit
Guest
Pipit

Malaysians must not allow the opinion of “one irrelevant foreigner” divide the country, says Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz.
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/08/16/rafidah-dont-let-one-irrelevant-foreigner-divide-us

“Why are Malaysians going against each other on account of some foreigner who is being sought after by his own country?

“Why are some of us still so vulnerable to have our minds being subverted in so many ways, seemingly in the name of religion?

tunglang
Guest
tunglang

Bible: There is one who speaks rashly, like a piercing sword; but the tongue of the wise brings healing.
But sadly, some are so eager for more of such rash speaking, never mind that the speeches are only in Indian English incomprehensible to them in full proper meaning. That’s where the danger (of misinterpretation) lies leading to hatred & violence instigated by such foreign preachers.

Pipit
Guest
Pipit

Zakir’s ‘lecture’ is in English. Not sure how many local audience can understand what he says. Maybe the likes of Firdaus Wong will be there to provide translation? As a Malaysian PR, Zakir should learn to speak in Malay since many Malays have insisted that non-Malays here must master the language.

Pipit
Guest
Pipit

This is what Zakir said in Kelantan that insulted the Malaysian Indians:

Lim Goh Poh
Guest
Lim Goh Poh

One Way Ticket was a hot hit song during which time song lovers shrieked out for more boogie moments.

Ottawan’s D.I.S.C.O. also a joyful tune for many probably Wei can ask his father to play the cassete tape.

tunglang
Guest
tunglang

You mean Wei & Shriek share the same shrieking father??? 🙂 🙂 🙂
Btw, shrieking (in pure joy + excitement) in the 60s is not the same as shrieking (in red-anger & frothing) & he-he-he (in sarcasm) now!

Pipit
Guest
Pipit

Both of them could be too young to live through the Disco era. Here is that famous Botak Disco (an indispensable cassette in late 70s/early eighties for every Walkman) for them to appreciate the tunes and ‘move it’ to the beat, no need to drop the mic:

Sanil
Guest
Sanil

Looks like Anil has inside info from Penang government – deep state?

Anyway Anilnetto.com is becoming like Astro, plenty of repeat and recycle stuff. Need to freshen up with food talk.

glissantia
Guest
glissantia

Recap from around 2014 on propaganda points: – MRT/LRT does not moves people at a higher rate. Estimates (a) evade dedicated BRT/ART lanes (b) compare the MRT/LRT corridors having the heaviest traffic to the BRT network of individial roads (c) cover the entire day, irrelevant to rush hour. – MRT/LRT provides good urban access only on major (ideal) routes. Even there, stations may be badly located due to politics or cronyism. Car parks become inadequate. MRT/LRT perpetuates the even more expensive, destructive and subversive triad of private cars, roads and petroleum industries. The drawbacks of even the current bus transport… Read more »

Shriek
Guest

Tell us how to have brt on major roads like Penang road? Remove all shop houses on both sides??MRT or LRT build above or tunnel. Brt although is cheap but requires drive more drivers and even tickect sellers for ART. You want Viet or banglas to sell or drove ART?

Wei
Guest
Wei

hehe…banker Lim mah hui probably read one page brochure with lots of colourful picture and decided it is the best system in the world….LOL

Gurdev singh
Guest

Mr netto why

tunglang
Guest
tunglang

There was a government initiative (with a private sector) to build transport buses in Kulim if I can recall that when I visited the place to study its setup for an A&M proposal project for a client. The chief officer was a kwei-lou (ang moh) plus an engineer also a kwei-lou. The rest were locals probably 3-D designers & workshop staff in a hangar-like building.
What’s happened to it till now I don’t know. That was in the 2000 decade, maybe 2006.

Shriek
Guest

Ask susu teh. He is bn gilakan or bn mca. A lot of kang tau. Kang tau dried up and now he is screaming for being thirst.

Shriek
Guest

Yes can save money but at expense of global warning. Read Syd morning herald. Less than 20 years, roads in north Syd will be jammed
If ART will orso jammed.
Even if roads are not jammed, they will be delayed not running according to schedule. Worst, we do not have a single ticketing system. Then back to square one like tu Lang waiting for more than half hour for the ART

glissantia
Guest
glissantia

Peter Newman did not quantify the cost to existing business, loss to residents from gentrification, and loss of local charm for residents and tourists. This may be the final nail in the coffin of World Heritage status for George Town. There will be more accidents and delays (due to construction and subsequent narrower roads), pollution-related diseases, and cheap immigrant lives lost (from relentless cutting of corners). Recent construction incidents show that the party responsible only pays a few tens of thousands of RM at most for one life. Perer Newman’s summary does not include speed and throughput. Instead, he includes… Read more »