Hello, hello, hello, our intrepid Samy Vellu has surfaced in Bangladesh this time over a controversial RM9.1bn bridge project.
The Padma Bridge is supposed to be a two-level 6.2km long steel truss bridge that will have a four-lane highway on the upper level and a single track railway on the lower level. (Why don’t we have rail links on our Penang bridges?) It will also have 15km of approach roads.
According to a report in the Daily Star of Bangladesh on 28 June, the Malaysian government will invest around Tk3bn for the construction of the Padma Bridge under an arrangement in a final draft proposal. Construction work will take three years and it will operate the bridge for 37 years before handing over the bridge to the Bangladesh government, the report said, citing sources. This was the proposal reportedly placed before Bangladesh Communications Minister Obaidul Quader by “Malaysian Prime Minister’s Special Envoy for infrastructure affairs for South Asia” Samy Vellu.
Days earlier, the Bangladesh government had rejected compromise conditions imposed by the World Bank following corruption probes on the US$2.9bn (RM9.1bn) bridge project.
In September 2011, the World Bank suspended its funding for the project after committing US$1.2bn in credit for the project. (The other financiers were ADB, IDB and JICA.) The World Bank submitted two reports on the corruption allegations, the second based on the findings of a Canadian government probe into graft allegations over the appointment of a bridge supervising consultant.
In a letter to the Bangladesh PM in early June, the World Bank listed several key conditions/suggestions for the funding:
– form a high-power team to probe allegations of corruption in the bridge project.
– appoint an independent body to monitor the implementation of the project and make recommendations.
– do not allow those linked to the corruption allegations to be part of the project implementation.
– allow co-financiers to be actively involved in the procurement process for the bridge.
– increase the capacity of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in the long-term.
The World Bank also wanted to be kept informed of the progress of the investigation.
On 29 June, the World Bank finally cancelled its $1.2bn financing for the project, pointing out that it had “credible evidence corroborated by a variety of sources which points to a high-level corruption conspiracy among Bangladeshi government officials”. This was reported by the Independent of Bangladesh.
On Tuesday, 3 July, Bangladesh Finance Minister AMA Muhith felt compelled to provide a lengthy explanation of the government’s version of events in Parliament. See his statement in the Daily Star. “The statement of the World Bank is not acceptable and the allegation that Bangladesh Government did not take appropriate action against corruption is also not correct,” he said.
“We prequalified five bidders and sent our recommendation to the World Bank in March, 2011. Without raising any objection against these firms they repeatedly advised us to prequalify a Chinese company named X. This advice was not accepted by our evaluation team comprised of specialists. The Bridge Division informed after an inquiry that X never applied for reconsideration and its Bangladeshi partner named Y resorted to fraudulent practice in this connection. This scheming firm established an office in China and applied for reconsideration in the name of X. On coming to know this, X informed in writing that they are not interested in this project. At the same time, they severed partnership with Y. The owner of Y is right now absconding. The World Bank went on repeatedly recommending X without examining properly the objection raised by X.”
The finance minister said the problem with the World Bank conditions was that “we were forced to admit the corruption allegations before they were substantiated. Therefore, we did not accede to their proposal and resorted to other means to dispel their concerns. Their second proposal was redundant as the ACC (the anti-corruption agency) formed their investigation team much earlier. Their third proposal is in contravention with the existing laws of the ACC which is independent and is not bound to be guided by the dictates of any foreign agency.”
For good measure, Muhith slammed the World Bank: “I consider that the statement of the WB has humiliated the whole country and the allegation labelled against us is not well founded. It is also not true that the Government of Bangladesh has not taken any appropriate action to avert corruption. I think we have considered courteously all the recommendations of the WB going well beyond our routine procedures.”
So now, enter the corruption-free Malaysians?!
Samy Vellu needs to brief Malaysians about what exactly is going on and who exactly will provide the financing for the project. Why go into such a project given the controversial background?
The larger question is, does Bangladesh really need a RM9bn bridge when there is so much poverty in the country?
Who or which company is ultimately going to profit the most?
Follow the money trail and see who benefits and who usually pays in projects like this:
Where is the money coming from?
Loans from (international?) financiers or government agencies. What do they get in return? Interest income.
Where does the money go?
- Giant (foreign?) construction firms, often from the same country that provides the financing.
- Design firms
- Steel and concrete firms
- Road builders
- Toll concessionaires
- Shareholders of these firms (including rent-seekers)
- (Corrupt?) intermediaries (‘commissions’, ‘success fees’, ‘consultants’ fees’)
Who foots the bill (costs plus profits/returns for the above parties) in the end?
Ordinary citizens – through taxes and/or tolls
Thanks to blog reader Loke for the tip off.
|Please help to support this blog if you can.
Read the commenting guidlelines for this blog.
Hi guys. I am from Bangladesh. We desperately need this project completed asap to accelerate economic pace in northern Bangladesh. But our govt. lost the faith of World bank by not removing the minister who was (allegedly) asking for 4% from a canadian company. That company was found guilty of unethical practice in a canadian court. But govt. did not removed that alleged minister. After 6months of dispute, that … minister is transferred to another ministry. (Allegedly) Corrupt officers of bridge department are also released on bail. Now, i need to know about this Dato Sami. Is he playing under… Read more »
If we want to know who is to benefit from the project its obviously both the countries – Bangladesh and Malaysia. Malaysia will enjoy the interest income and the toll charges of the vehicles that will board the bridge. On the other hand, Bangladesh will enjoy a GDP growth of 1.2% (which is solely dependent on the bridge). Corruption lies in all countries, even the most civilized ones but the problem is the affects it has on the economy. The government always takes a decision on behalf of the betterment of the people of the country. If the officials involved… Read more »
Bangladeshi FM has told WB to buzz off. Indonesian FM when offered more loans after the Asian Financial Crisis told it to buzz off. Does Bolehland have the guts, or is it too deeply in?
true blue comedian never retire, good to see samy back entertaining the the rakyat in the wake of appalling state of affairs handled out by najib, welcome back aiyoyo
Wow. Before Malaysia can start exporting maids, we are exporting (dubious) practises first.Wah Low
How can we trust this … man to deal on behalf of M’sia govt … ? If he can do it in his own country, he can also do it outside of his country….
I bet you his hair piece surfaced first before he did.
Think about it, some of us do miss Samy Velu. Mayeb the cost involved “bikin sungai” first to justify building the bridge.
Why is it that in every major project there are corruptions and scandals. It seem that Malaysia has become the land of CORRUPTIONS AND SCANDALS.
Before it goes the way of Zimbabwe and Myanmar and the standard of the people deteriorate further we must pull ourselves UP and made that CHANGE at the next GE.
CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE IS WHAT WE REALLY NEED AT NEXT GE
That is bangla land lah YANG ~
Knowing full well that this project is controversial and the deal may be corrupt, yet Malaysia poke its head inside knowing fully that corruption exist especially in Bangland. You said it right, this is Bangland and only corrupt would like to deal with the corrupt … Just like the Scorpene and Cowgate.
Oop sorry, Malaysia should more be like Bangla Land not Zimbabwe or Mayanmar
UMNO’s Kemelah state representative Ayub Rahmat call for ‘true hudud’ be implemented in Johor to cover both Muslims and non-Muslims, unlike what he described as hudud’ being proposed by PAS-led Kelantan which cover ONLY Muslims. MCA as usual object but being a fool :: Umno rep now says discuss hudud proposal ‘quietly’ and Ah Cheap Kor keep quiet. Do it quietly and don`t let the other stupid guys from MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PPP know about it until we implement it. ISLAMIC OF WHICH HUDUD IS PART OF IT. hahahaha mca CSL and son are really stupid. Its very clear who… Read more »
Yes not forget the other stupid idiot Geelakan
Umno’s version of hudud is to apply to all citizens, even if you are not Muslim!
MCA canot answer. So MCA created diversion using GAn Tian Loo to attack LGE on baseless allegations!
Which country could turn into bangla land 2? Can anyone guess?