Bukit Relau: PHT urges MPPP to take stern action


The Penang Heritage Trust has written a letter to the MPPP president urging her to take stern action in response to the illegal development at the top of Bukit Relau in Penang.

4 July 2013

Dato’ Hajjah Patahiyah Ismail
Yang Di-Pertua,
Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang (MPPP)
Level 17, KOMTAR
10503 George Town, PENANG.

Dear Dato,

Illegal Hill Development of Bukit Relau, Penang

‘Only when the last tree has been cut down; Only when the last river has been poisoned; Only when the last fish has been caught; Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten’ – American Indian Proverb.

The Penang Heritage Trust would like to take this opportunity to commend the Penang Island Municipal Council (MPPP) for taking action against the developer involved in the recent illegal hill clearing and development on Bukit Relau. We are heartened that the local and state authorities are taking a stand that will discourage further action of such nature. However, we are also disheartened that it had to take public outcry and obvious damage towards the hill before the authorities are compelled to act and take action against such brazen and flagrant disregard for the law.

The Penang Heritage Trust is committed towards the protection and conservation of culture and heritage, and this includes both built and natural heritage. Therefore, we are compelled to state our stand against such actions of mass destruction, threatening the sanctity and security of our natural landscapes, especially the hills on Penang. These unregulated and recent developments threaten the natural environment of Penang, and will bring upon adverse effects on the economy and the people of Penang. In a State that advocates sustainability, and with a tagline of ‘Cleaner, Greener Penang’, surely such developments do not fall within the aforementioned tagline.

We wish to also raise the concern that despite the law suit against the developer, the sentence and punishment for this illegal act may in fact be too light. It is understood that the developer will be charged under Section 70A of the Street Drainage and Building Act 1974 that carries a jail term of not more than five years and a fine of not less than RM50,000.00 or both. However, we feel that such fine is not significant to deter such ‘in your face’ illegal developments. A daily punitive fine of RM100 per day is relatively light in relation to the quantum of such destruction and development. Such measly fine will never compensate for the demolition and destruction of our pristine jungles, hills and heritage have already taken place. Therefore, PHT will like to urge the authorities to rally together and pass out strong sentences such as imprisonment, the revoking the developers licence and to impose a ban for a good many years. Only such actions may serve as a reminder that the State will not take law-flouters lightly.

Penang Heritage Trust is not unfamiliar with cases of non-compliance happening and the lack of firm, authoritative actions taken. The recent demolition of 20 Pykett Avenue, and the fine of RM 6,000.00 against a development with gross development value of RM 500 million comes to mind immediately.

Penang has lost several prominent landmarks including the likes of The Metropole along Northam Road, Phrya Manopakorn’s bungalow along Burmah Lane; and is facing on-going threats including the desecration of the Goddess of Mercy Temple in Pitt Street (a Category I landmark). These are all victims of poor enforcement and punishment of crimes perpetrated against our heritage.

The Penang Heritage Trust also wishes to state it’s complete objection to this seemingly contradictory precedent set by State- the ‘re-zoning’ of land status to facilitate luxury developments. Hill land, residential land and coastal land is rezoned to benefit luxury developments with no consideration towards the impact on the socio-economic development that is needed. How does the State Government plan on justifying allowing ‘residential luxury bungalows on the top of our precious forested hills’ as ‘special projects’ allowable above the 250ft height limit? As it is, there in an overhang of more than 80,000 residential units in Penang, and most are beyond the affordable range of Penangites. This trend has to stop. PHT strongly advocates the State to review and gazette the Penang Local Plan and Penang Special Area Plan for George Town World Heritage Site in order to avoid such ad hoc rezoning. This will halt unwanted disasters and will be seen that the State Government holds true to its word of providing a ‘Cleaner, Greener’ state and that it is concerned for its citizens, and the sustainability of the environment and its heritage.

From the concerned,

Penang Heritage Trust

cc: YAB Tuan Lim Guan Eng, Chief Minister of Penang

EXCO members


All MPPP councillors

All Press and News portals

Please help to support this blog if you can.

Read the commenting guidlelines for this blog.
Notify of

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
6 Jul 2013 7.33pm

FMT News: Karpal wants tycoon’s firms blacklisted if…

If or not, a broad daylight ‘raping’ crime against virgin trees & hills has been committed.
If or not, a more deterrent law should be in place without delay.
If or not, show us the rule of law without favor or discrimination.

Even the mighty windstorm of Nature has shown us its firmness & displeasure by bringing down a row of fencing along Jalan Bukit Gambir. Not a good day for botak-thinking.

5 Jul 2013 9.30pm

bravo pht, but what about our rights to our natural assets and features that have been taken away from us, eg: chin farm waterfall, if the present admin have to play the blame game again, at least make things right and don’t kowtow to developers like in bythesea fiasco

4 Jul 2013 8.38pm

The problem with Penang state gomen is the apparent lack of money for housing development. Oh, Yes. Blame the Feds (first). So the gomen’s beggar attitude & dependent state of affair on the developers, many of whom (99.999%) have no mercy for land left in natural state, undeveloped or under-developed. Given their massive financial clout with banks, investors, speculators & suppliers, and thus political/election funding, they can do anything including ‘raping’ of virgin trees (that cannot scream or point a finger) in broad daylight. What extent of shame or conscience can we expect of them recalcitrants? The most viable measure… Read more »

4 Jul 2013 7.07pm

For such wanton disregard of law, the developer should be punished the full 5 year term. Otherwise the whole of Penang hill will be destroyed one day. As for fine, it should be commensurate with developer’s expected profit so that no one will think it is profitable to destroy hill for development. By the way make it a rule that any piece of land illegally develop such as this one will be permanently ban for development for the next 99 years.

Anak Penang
Anak Penang
4 Jul 2013 4.52pm

yes, the punishment is too light. we need to follow closely else they thought Penangites have already forgotten about this.

4 Jul 2013 3.48pm

RM 50,000 fine is clearly no deterrent. Just jail them. That should get the message across.

WindStorm vs2
WindStorm vs2
4 Jul 2013 3.46pm

“As it is, there in an overhang of more than 80,000 residential units in Penang”.
ALLOWED: Build, build, build for the Richie & Famous.
CLOSE BOTH EYES: Destroy, destroy, destroy what are priceless Penang Heritage.
We didn’t elect a state government to ‘pushed’ us out of Penang, an unaffordable home scenario of false price appreciation egged on by property gurus, gambled by speculators & proclaimed by greedy developers.
Better think well out of Komtar Tower comes next windstorm of protest!

4 Jul 2013 12.23pm

Anil, any update from LGE team regarding to ‘wait 30-days’ promise ??? It was over 30 days. See this again http://anilnetto.com/economy/development-issues/hill-destruction-mppp-reveals-landowners-after-preliminary-search/

We must follow/monitor this case closely. Penangites “tidak mudah lupa” !!!