Singapore unearths its pre-colonial history that began centuries earlier


The New York Times reports:

While earlier generations learned a narrative that essentially started in 1819 with the British colonial administrator, Sir Stamford Raffles, stumbling upon a sleepy Malay fishing village, 13-year-olds now learn of a golden age that started 500 years earlier.

The new story, introduced in January, brings into focus a 300-year period, from 1300 to 1600, when Singapore was a thriving multinational trading hub, with an estimated population of 10,000.

Hopefully, we can take another look at the precolonial history of Malaysia as well.

Please help to support this blog if you can.

Read the commenting guidlelines for this blog.
Notify of

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
najib manaukau

Anil, Your above article only confirms what is always known by the world that there never were such places known as Australia, America, Singapore or Malaya just to name a few places. These places were named by the Brits and the people living therein were called as Australians, Americans, Singaporeans or Malayans. … now fencing up the Orang Asli , hoping that when they are out the people’s sight they will also be out of the people’s mind…They will always be known as the people living at one time on the tree top by encyclopedia britannica. So are the early… Read more »


I am not an expert on these matters, but I would like to comment. I would see Singapore as an exception, since it was already known as Singapura before the British arrived. The rest you mentioned though, were indeed named by the west. Singapore’s Government’s position to “rectify” its history is to convince the people that immigration has and always will be a part of life in the city-state, hence the anti-immigration rhetoric is unjustified. There’s also the matter to outright proclaim Singapore has always been a city-state from its very birth, justifying its existence as an independent nation. Frankly,… Read more »

Don Anamalai

On the subject of history, the Umno historian Prof Zainal Kling has claimed that:
1. Malaya was a British protectorate, not a colony.
2. But the British did have administrative powers in the fields of finance and the exploitation of Malaya’s natural resources.
3. However, Malay sovereignty (kedaulatan Melayu) was still protected.
4. Therefore, what is now Malaysia (with the exception of Melaka and Penang) was never colonized by the British.

Singapore Observer

The Sri Vijayan city of Tumasik (Sea Town in ancient Javanese) was built around Canning Park with a hill fort built where Fort Canning now stands. The oldest remains on the hill dates back to the 2nd century C.E. (A.D.), i.e. contemporary with the Roman Empire. The Chinese and Hindu Javanese traded there. There was a large Hindu temple at Battery Park and in the colonial era, its only significant remnant was a large monolith which was carved into the shape of a lion’s head. This was a temple makara. When the Palembang colonists arrived in the 13th century and… Read more »


Yeah, and Palembang killed the local chief there and become the chief himself.That angered Siam King and Palembang got to cabut to Melaka. He became sultan and convert to Islam…