Penang land reclamation: That ‘RM1bn compensation’ figure

10
540

This is a third statement by Penang Forum on the land reclamation controversy:

According to a recent headline news item, the Penang chief minister claims that if the motion is carried through, the state government may have to pay compensation of RM1bn and could be bankrupted.

Of course, no one in their right mind would wish for this. But to convince the public instead of throwing a bewildering plethora of numbers randomly, the state should systematically present the data and facts to the public so they can draw their own conclusions.

The BN’s 3,241 acres

The Seri Tanjung Pinang project makes up a large chunk of the 3,241 acres of land reclamation rights awarded by the Barisan Penang state government.

The STP concession was originally given in 1992. There are two phases to STP:

  1. Phase I consisting of 240 acres was completed in 2006.
  2. In April 2011, the Pakatan Penang state government gave an ‘in-principle approval’ to reclaim 760 acres of land for STP phase 2 (Source: STP-EIA, Vol. 1, Executive Summary, page 1).

Here are a couple of burning questions the state should answer to dispel the anxieties of the people of Penang over the STP reclamation project:

  • Was the reclamation concession given in 1992 an approval in perpetuity or for a limited period to be renewed or reviewed periodically?
  • Does the state have the right to impose new requirements if conditions change at the time when the concession rights are renewed?

To clear the public’s doubts, the state should make all these land reclamation agreements publicly available and show how it could be liable for RM1bn.

The “in-principle approval”, given by the present state government in 2011, seems to suggest that the renewal was not automatic, and it has some authority and discretion in amending, if not in approving, the STP2 project.

The chief minister also emphasised that “opposing Umno’s motion would also show our disapproval (emphasis added) of BN approving 3,241 acres for land reclamation”.

Since the STP2 is part of what the previous state government approved, the logical question is why is the present state government holding a 20% stake in the STP2 project? Is this a case of running with the hares and hunting with the hounds?

An additional 4,295 acres

Back to the question of the RM1bn compensation that has been bandied about. Surely, the state was referring to projects approved in the past when mentioning this figure.

But what about future or upcoming land reclamation projects the state is planning?

Full statement on Penang Forum website.

 

Please help to support this blog if you can.

Read the commenting guidlelines for this blog.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
owc
owc
15 Dec 2015 12.15pm

Penang fishermen protested against land reclamation, as reported on Astro AEC:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqiIkzJdlw4

gk ong
gk ong
15 Dec 2015 3.13pm
Reply to  owc

The fishermen should consider commercial fish farming as successfully done in Singapore as the fish stock is depleting and their children are unlikely to go out to open sea for catch given the unpredictable weather pattern today. But first they must ditch the diesel subsidy mentality as some of them make money by reselling subsidised fuel to Thai and Indon fishermen.

Hooray
Hooray
8 Dec 2015 1.48pm

Development should not confine to just building physical infrastructures like highways or condominiums. We should put focus on development of human minds thru education, reading, sports exercises etc.
I hope Penang government do care to build state of the art libraries easily access by the public. Many children from poor families can use the library facilities to learn and stay away from vice activities.
Agree?

Reggie Bollie
Reggie Bollie
8 Dec 2015 2.14pm
Reply to  Hooray

Children nowadays do not read much, only play games on smartphones. Very sad indeed.

tunglang
tunglang
11 Dec 2015 8.17am
Reply to  Hooray

Only with better education & job opportunities can the people ‘upgrade’ their lifestyle to match the Cosmopolitan Penang concept. Not the other way around.
That’s why the No Money, No Talk of CAT Syndrome is precursor for more Penangites emigrating the island to other states. Then don’t blame anything conveniently fathomed in CAT’s brain for another round of brain drain.

Hooray
Hooray
8 Dec 2015 1.03pm

Gerakan T(eng) challenges LGE to reveal past and present reclaimation agreements committed, ie the north portion signed by Gerakan K and south portion (some call it Heng ,Ong, Huat 3 unnatural islands).

The people is now waiting for the royal rumble no hold bar revelation, better don’t disappoint!

Ong
Ong
7 Dec 2015 10.18am

janganlah pedulikan ini activist-activist cari makan yang bermotif persendirian dan bukannya betul-betul pencinta alam semula jadi, buatlah dan bawakan perkembangan yang berpatutan kepada rakyat Penang ini.

Hooray
Hooray
8 Dec 2015 10.54am
Reply to  Ong

Ong is part of Heng-Ong-Huat trilogy to spur Penang growth?

tunglang
tunglang
11 Dec 2015 8.23am
Reply to  Hooray

Ong-Heng-Huat Combo?
Micro examine this Ong: Ong-Niao-Ong-Ka-Ki. Lu Lang Si Kin-Kin.

Reggie Bollie
Reggie Bollie
8 Dec 2015 2.13pm
Reply to  Ong

Some are not happy because the new development could block their sea view.