Najib’s ‘house arrest’

0
33

Aliran has released a statement on the latest developments:

The news has made headlines both at home and abroad, and for good reason. For many, this decision has crossed a red line.

The political significance of the Pardons Board’s decision can hardly escape the attention of various groups of people.

Ordinary people’s concerns should have a place in a democratic country like ours, particularly for those who value the rule of law and justice. The government must respond to these concerns.

Aliran believes the government’s professed fight against corruption will now be viewed with cynicism. It may give international observers the impression that the country has lost its moral compass.

It raises the question of whether this could lead to double standards and injustice in how our justice system is administered – one pathway for the rich and powerful, another for the vulnerable.

It appears the rich and powerful will now be able to sidestep judicial outcomes and make a mockery of justice, under the guise of ‘compassion’.

Perhaps the Attorney General’s Chambers can enlighten us on what will happen in Najib’s other pending cases if the decisions go against him?

We note he still owes RM1.7bn in unpaid taxes, not to mention the billions already lost from public funds due to his crimes.

The Attorney General’s Chambers should also clarify the legal basis for house arrest, as Najib’s case has set a precedent. How will it be enforced and what conditions apply? These need to be spelt out, if only to give them some semblance of credibility.

After all, being confined to a luxury home, in this day and age, still means enjoying most home comforts and access to the outside world through communications technology.

What about other high-profile politicians convicted of, or serving time for, serious corruption?

What about those imprisoned for petty theft and other crimes? Would they too be eligible to apply for house arrest on compassionate grounds?

The country is already polarised by the politics of race and religion. This decision could deepen those divisions in a society often reminded of the virtue of being ethical.

All this is happening while the country faces a host of problems, such as ethnic polarisation and the high cost of living.

A government that promised reform and an end to corruption now owes the people answers, not silence.

If arrangements like this can be made in this case, people will rightly ask if this can happen again and on what basis. The government cannot wash its hands of an issue with such serious implications and consequences.

Aliran executive committee
19 September 2026

Please help to support this blog if you can.

Read the commenting guidlelines for this blog.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest