Francis rocks church with radical rethink of economy

5
76

Francis, the Bishop of Rome, has come out with a new apostolic exhortation, The Joy of the Gospel, that recognises the need to resolve “the structural causes of poverty” without delay.

Everyone should ponder over these words:

Welfare projects, which meet certain urgent needs, should be considered merely temporary responses. As long as the problems of the poor are not radically resolved by rejecting the absolute autonomy of markets and financial speculation and by attacking the structural causes of inequality,[173] no solution will be found for the world’s problems or, for that matter, to any problems. Inequality is the root of social ills.

Isn’t that why we are having a lot of social ills, including the worrying crime rate, in the country – because of the inequality. BR1Ms and other handouts are just like bandaid masking deeper structural problems including cronyism, political corruption and neoliberal policies that place a heavy burden on workers and other ordinary people.

The full text of Franicis’ exhortation can be found on the Vatican website.

Here are some sections of interest:

189. Solidarity is a spontaneous reaction by those who recognize that the social function of property and the universal destination of goods are realities which come before private property. The private ownership of goods is justified by the need to protect and increase them, so that they can better serve the common good; for this reason, solidarity must be lived as the decision to restore to the poor what belongs to them. These convictions and habits of solidarity, when they are put into practice, open the way to other structural transformations and make them possible. Changing structures without generating new convictions and attitudes will only ensure that those same structures will become, sooner or later, corrupt, oppressive and ineffectual.

READ MORE:  An unusual Christmas homily for our time

The economy and the distribution of income

202. The need to resolve the structural causes of poverty cannot be delayed, not only for the pragmatic reason of its urgency for the good order of society, but because society needs to be cured of a sickness which is weakening and frustrating it, and which can only lead to new crises. Welfare projects, which meet certain urgent needs, should be considered merely temporary responses. As long as the problems of the poor are not radically resolved by rejecting the absolute autonomy of markets and financial speculation and by attacking the structural causes of inequality,[173] no solution will be found for the world’s problems or, for that matter, to any problems. Inequality is the root of social ills.

203. The dignity of each human person and the pursuit of the common good are concerns which ought to shape all economic policies. At times, however, they seem to be a mere addendum imported from without in order to fill out a political discourse lacking in perspectives or plans for true and integral development. How many words prove irksome to this system! It is irksome when the question of ethics is raised, when global solidarity is invoked, when the distribution of goods is mentioned, when reference in made to protecting labour and defending the dignity of the powerless, when allusion is made to a God who demands a commitment to justice. At other times these issues are exploited by a rhetoric which cheapens them. Casual indifference in the face of such questions empties our lives and our words of all meaning. Business is a vocation, and a noble vocation, provided that those engaged in it see themselves challenged by a greater meaning in life; this will enable them truly to serve the common good by striving to increase the goods of this world and to make them more accessible to all.

READ MORE:  Another blow for Malaysia Airlines as CEO Christoph Mueller quits

204. We can no longer trust in the unseen forces and the invisible hand of the market. Growth in justice requires more than economic growth, while presupposing such growth: it requires decisions, programmes, mechanisms and processes specifically geared to a better distribution of income, the creation of sources of employment and an integral promotion of the poor which goes beyond a simple welfare mentality. I am far from proposing an irresponsible populism, but the economy can no longer turn to remedies that are a new poison, such as attempting to increase profits by reducing the work force and thereby adding to the ranks of the excluded.

Thanks to Bob Waldrop for his alert, which brought this to my attention. Bob says, “To which, all I can say (about the paragraphs above) is — WOW! And hat to Daniel Nichols who writes the Caelum et Terra blog
which I think Dorothy Day would have enjoyed.”

Please help to support this blog if you can.

Read the commenting guidlelines for this blog.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Anil,

    Just to share this…

    Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi, one of the most influential figures in modern social and political activism, considered these traits to be the most spiritually perilous to humanity.

    “Seven Social Sins”

    * Politics without Principle
    * Wealth Without Work
    * Pleasure Without Conscience
    * Knowledge without Character
    * Commerce without Morality
    * Science without Humanity
    * Worship without Sacrifice

    This is the 8th sin by Arun Gandhi.

    * Rights Without Responsibility

    ~ Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi (1925) Young India

    “There comes a point when a man must refuse to answer to his leader if he is also to answer to his own conscience.” ~ Hartley Shawcross (1902-2003), prosecutor at Nuremberg War Crimes tribunal

    You be the judge.

    Shalom.

    • An example of pleasure without conscience:
      Ng Yen Yen racked up a RM2.71 million bill for overseas trips between 2010 and January this year, at a time when Putrajaya was telling Malaysians to tighten their belts and adjust their lifestyles because of rising living costs.

  2. Anil
    Be careful using the term “Radical”.
    Any sort of thinking “haluan kiri” that is different from barang naik thought process can be considered
    Komunis (not able to differentiate it from Socialisma even the Prof Madya of local U).
    Lucky for Siti Aishah still can come home not considered a traitor like someone who are banned returning becoz radikal ideology is allegedly “haram” ?.

    • Not my words, but Francis’! “As long as the problems of the poor are not radically resolved by rejecting the absolute autonomy of markets and financial speculation and by attacking the structural causes of inequality,[173] no solution will be found for the world’s problems or, for that matter, to any problems. Inequality is the root of social ills.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here