“Someone” appears to have had his feathers ruffled in Sarawak. Apparently, this “someone” in Sarawak is upset with “someone” in Penang – apparently an activist who has hit out at the 12 more dams in the pipeline in Sarawak. (Hmm, I wonder who that could be…)
Anyway, this “someone” in Sarawak should be interested to know that it is not just one or two “someones” over here who think his dam-building frenzy sounds cuckoo. Only 2 per cent of you in a poll on this site (to which over 500 of you have responded so far) think that the plan for 12 more dams in Sarawak is just what Malaysia needs right now. In other words, 98 per cent of you seem to think the plan to increase capacity by 600 per cent “tak masuk akal” (doesn’t make sense).
Maybe, being the “democrat” that he is, he is not used to having his plans criticised. Maybe he has never experienced what it feels like to have his land grabbed by others either.
As for being far away from Sarawak, you don’t have to actually smoke cigarettes to know that smoking is harmful to health.
Perhaps this “someone” in Sarawak can tell us why Sime Darby pulled out from the undersea cable project, the cost of which has reportedly ballooned to some RM15 billion. An Edge report suggested that Sime Darby pulled out because it didn’t consider the project viable. Surely Sime Darby would have done its research and been totally aware of the “the state’s condition and its future direction”.
This “someone” should make public the findings of his “careful study”. He should also tell us which companies are likely to benefit from the construction of all these dams…
This from the Borneo Post today:
Damn the dam critic
By Puvaneswary Devindran
Taib slams activist; says he should make careful study before opening his mouth
KUCHING: Chief Minister Pehin Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud yesterday said the criticism directed at Sarawak’s 12 proposed hydroelectric dams was an ‘old tune’ played by someone ignorant of the state’s condition and its future direction.
He said the world was facing depleting energy resources, particularly fossil fuel, where for every four barrels of oil used, only one new barrel was found.
“The world has been trying to overcome this, and then someone in Penang comes up to sing the same old tune and criticise Sarawak without knowing what the condition here is like.
“He (critic) should make a careful study before opening his mouth,” the Chief Minister told reporters after opening the Sixth Wacana Pendidikan Islam at a hotel here yesterday.
Taib did not say who that ‘someone’ was but he nevertheless slammed the person and others for making an issue out of the whole thing when it was a non-issue in the first place.
He said that Mulu National Park would not be submerged with the building of a proposed dam in Tutoh as the park was located further away.
Environmental activists had claimed that the park, known as the ‘Jewel of Sarawak’ would be submerged if the dam were to be built, and in the process, it would lose its status as a World Heritage Site.
Besides Tutoh, the other 11 proposed dams are located at Ulu Air, Metjawah, Belaga, Baleh, Belepeh, Lawas, Limbang, Baram, Murum and Linau rivers.
The plan that seeks to meet future industrialisation needs would also include an extension to the Batang Ai dam.
As soon as the news broke out, environmentalists and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) began attacking the plan with questions about the need for that many dams.
They worry that the dams would lead to the destruction of Borneo’s natural environment and wildlife, and also displacement of the rural people.
It was reported in The Star on July 23 that all these dams would complement the 2,400mw Bakun dam, pushing the total generating capacity in the state to 7,000mw by 2020, an increase of more than 600 per cent from the current capacity.
The plans for the dams were revealed during a presentation at the China Asean Power Cooperation and Development Forum in Nanning, China, in October last year.
The 48-slide presentation has been made available on the Internet and the presentation also said that Chinese companies were expected to design, build and commission the dams.
The report also said that Sarawak’s current energy output was 933mw and that it did not need any more energy.
But there were plans to expand the aluminium smelting industry in the state, which would need the planned output.
Furthermore, Bakun’s 2,400mw was originally meant for Peninsular Malaysia.
Deputy Minister of Energy, Water and Communications Datuk Joseph Salang however said that these dams were necessary as consumption was projected to increase with the development of Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE).
He told reporters in Kuala Lumpur on Tuesday that the dams would only be approved if they passed the environmental impact assessment, and he did not expect the projects to materialise any time soon although the plan said the dams were slated to complete by 2020.
Which of the following does Malaysia need? (You may choose more than one)
- Solar energy research (73%, 623 Votes)
- We should be conserving energy (64%, 549 Votes)
- None of these (26%, 224 Votes)
- More conventional plants (13%, 114 Votes)
- A nuclear power plant (9%, 75 Votes)
- Bakun Dam (5%, 43 Votes)
- Submarine cables to transmit electricity to peninsula (4%, 30 Votes)
- 12 more dams in Sawarak (2%, 15 Votes)
Total Voters: 854