Well, what do you think? Should Penang rush into Wifi or should it adopt a very cautious approach, after studying all the scientific concerns? Perhaps we need to probe deeper into why Germany has advised its citizens to avoid Wifi and why the European Parliament has just voted for stricter safety limits.

You decide if it’s safe enough. I guess the difference between Wifi for the whole of Penang and other devices that you buy (e.g. mobile phones) is that in the former you don’t have a choice whereas in the latter, you can choose whether you want to use them.

To recap, this is what the BioInitiative Report says:

No lower limit for bioeffects and adverse health effects from RF has been established, so the possible health risks of wireless WLAN and WI-FI systems, for example, will require further research and no assertion of safety at any level of wireless exposure (chronic exposure) can be made at this time.

And the European Parliament has just voted 522 to 16 for stricter safety limits:

The European Parliament “is greatly concerned at the Bio-Initiative international report concerning EMFs, which summarises over 1500 studies on that topic and which points in its conclusions to the health risks posed by emissions from mobile-telephony devices such as mobile telephones, UMTS, WiFi, WiMax and Bluetooth, and also DECT landline telephones.” Further, it points out the need to “address vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, newborn babies and children.”

Contrast that with this report:

WHO studies Wi-Fi risks
The Province

Published: Thursday, September 25, 2008

The amount of non-ionizing radiation absorbed by a person’s body from a Wi-Fi station is less than one-fifth that they receive from FM radio and TVs that surround them day and night, the World Health Organization has concluded.

And the level of non-ionizing radiation — radiation such as light or microwaves that do not cause genetic damage — from the wireless computer routers are between 0.002 per cent and two per cent of international safe-exposure guidelines, the WHO says in a report that considered 10 years of research.

But check out this new research from Sweden:

Children are especially vulnerable to radiation from mobile and cordless phones, Wi-Fi and other devices, because their brains and nervous systems are still developing and since their heads are smaller and their skulls are thinner – the radiation penetrates deeper into their brains.

The Swedish research presented this month at the first international conference on mobile phones and health and represents an analysis of data from one of the biggest studies carried out into the risk that the radiation causes cancer, and was led by Professor Lennart Hardell of the University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden.

This would be enough for me to adopt a very cautious approach, looking out for public health and safety all the time. Few people are against technology, but we need to make sure it’s safe i.e. not harmful in the long run.

This from theSun:

Guan Eng: No proof of wi-fi health risks
By Himanshu Bhatt

GEORGE TOWN (Sept 25,2008) : The Penang government has found no evidence that the open wi-fi transmission network planned over the whole state would pose a health hazard to inhabitants, and will go ahead with the project.

Chief minister Lim Guan Eng said today the economic and social opportunities presented by the project should not be stopped when there is no concrete proof that it is risky.

He stressed that the wi-fi band frequency was, in fact, lower than that for mobile phones.

“Until we are convinced otherwise, we should not stand in the way of technology,” he said.

The Consumers Association of Penang recently expressed concern that a “wi-fi fog” over the state may have adverse radiation effects on people.

“Unless they show evidence that it is indeed a danger, we will work to ensure Penang has opportunities to compete for investments at national and international levels,” he said.

Lim said the state had thus far received objections from two parties against the wi-fi project.

He stressed that he was willing to meet them as the state was concerned about their views.

However, he dismissed having public consultations before embarking on the plan, saying the state’s progress would be dragged if it had consultations for every project.

“Do we need to consult before deciding on the second Penang bridge? We already know the project is helpful,” he said.

Lim said this at a preview of the state’s plan to have WiMAX technology access among internet users in Penang. The WiMAX programme will be run by Packet One Networks (M) Sdn Bhd.

Packet One CEO Michael Lai clarified that the company’s end-user modems, base stations and microwave links to transmit and receive the WiMAX service have received approvals from Sirim.

The service has also received confirmation from the Malaysian Nuclear Agency, he added.

The agency confirmed that the actual radiation levels observed around its P1 W1MAX base stations were below the standard limit for public exposure set by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) and the International Commission for Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), he said.

The site radiation assessment was conducted around the WiMAX facility at FSBM building in Cyberjaya.

“Based on both certifications, the public can rest assure that P1 W1MAX poses no demonstrable scientific evidence of a risk to health,” he said.

Related posts:

  37 Responses to “Wi-fi health risks: Yes or No?”

  1. An anti-wifi activist came to (assume) Mr. Lim GE to complain about the ill effects of wifi. Mr.Lim said ‘Sorry,I don’t have time now. Can you let me have your handphone number, I talk to you later ? Quickly, the activist gave his hand phone number. Mr. Lim said,’Do you know that the EMF radiation from your phone use for 20 minutes is more than ONE YEAR’s exposure to wifi ?’ The activist made a quick exit.

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Overall, I think there are always paranoids out there with their own hidden agenda on any issue.

    WiFi affects the internet cable suppliers and other vested interests. FREE WiFi would see massive losses by line suppliers like Celcom (streamyx and similar) and dedicated WiFi suppliers, as well.

    Mobile phones have been with us for a long time already. Remember the reports of people having their ears burned and brains fried? WiFi is a proven technology, as well.

    If we can accept mobile phones and microwave ovens, WiFi is no different EXCEPT Penang wants to give it FREE. That’s when vested interests begin their work……

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. My opinion technically, micro wave transmission is a Harzard, just like microwave oven able to cook a chicken at high power.

    Well transmission for mobile communication between Hphone or notebooks to the nearest Base Station(transceiver-Transmit & Receive) very low power that’s is why the Mobile companies have to put up alot of Base station bcos the signal is week & low power. The problem is the Base Stations linked to the main centres(Mobile Switching centre) are carried via Micro wave or optical fibre cable(OFC). If they carried thru OFC than no issue of micro wave radiation.

    The problem is some telcos do not own OFC network, so they may have to lease from other Telcos which might cost huge RM, so they may opt for micro wave as their carrier, where the Transceivers could be installed on top of residential/commercial buildings close to people.

    Penang State intention of putting WiFi is Good but authorities got to play their role in implementation by not compromising Health.

    If specs are stictly follow & authorities play their role than I see no issue.

    My suggestion, the carrier from Base Station to their switching centres should be Fiber Optic Cable(OFC) not microwave.
    If they don’t have OFC Network, than subscribe/leased from other Telcos.

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. The radiation level of wi-fi is insignificant because the area of coverage is less than 100 meters. In a walled area, you cannot even get beyond 3~4 layers of walls.

    Our CRT monitor (where the electron beam constantly strikes a phosphorus surface)radiates more harmful rays than a wifi antenna.

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. All high-frequency electromagnetic radiation is POTENTIALLY hazardous to your health. That’s the truth, but doesn’t help you to assess the risks.

    The potential risk to children, especially, from mobile phone radiation is because – just think about it – you are regularly holding a radio transmitter right next to your brain. Some people talk for hours on a mobile phone. The skull only manages to reduce the strength of the radiation slightly. Children have thinner skulls and smaller brains, so the risk is greater.

    Television sets emit potentially harmful magnetic and electromagnetic radiation. But most people watch TV from between 8 to 15 feet from the set – and no evidence has arisen in over 60 years of TV usage that the radiation shortens your life or damages your health in any significant way. Watching TV excessively probably does shorten your life, but that’s a totally different health problem.

    Back to Wi-Fi. The signal would be very widespread but of a relatively low strength. Your notebook would be transmitting/ receiving signals, but its not like you normally hold your notebook right next to your brain or body for hours.

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. I think many commenters mistook the WI-FI signal from their home base station as the issue of contention here. This signal is very weak and cannot go very far. With line of sight at most 100m. What people are really concern with is the transmitting station that could boost the signal to 5 Km. The transponder station generates a lot of radiation. This is the same with handphone station. I think many commenters are talking pass each other.

    I won’t be surprise that diseases such as headache, high blood pressure, cancer, neurological diseases etc. are much higher around such stations.

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Common lah. Why so kiasi?
    Penang is giving FREE wi-fi so that I can cancel off my streamyx. Our CM is actually trying to get these AMNO **** out of business and you are talking about kiasi! Are you still supporting the Barisan?

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. [...] of the concerns have also been reported by Anil Netto in his blog “Wifi health risk: Yes or No?”, “Wifi health risks” and “More concern about Wifi [...]

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Study has shown the exposure to mobile phone radiation for 20min equals to the 1year of wifi.

    To those overly paranoid people who are so afraid of wifi, let me propose this….

    Stop using your cell phone for 20min today, and you get to use wifi for FREE for 1 year, without any incremental health impact. Repeat the same thing every year, and you get FREE wifi for a Lifetime. Of course, this applies to Penang only:-) What a great deal!!! We’re paying about RM80-100/mth to TMNet Streamyx, so you do the math. And you can keep blogging away in forums like this for free!!

    So please be practical. Like it or not, even if the radiation threat is real, wifi is not the one to go after. You’ll have to throw away the mobile phones, your microwave ovens, your TVs, FM radio etc etc first.

    Meanwhile, great job CM Lim GE!! Please keep up the good work in Penang.

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. So better all of the NGOs go suck eggs…why? If you think it’s going to affect penangnites..why aren’t you all making any news about this

    http://mis-asia.com/news/articles/malaysian-university-rolls-out-new-wireless-wan

    Come on lar…..get your facts right. You are just beating round the bushes…..I think it’s time for Cap AND CONCERNED CITIZEN TO BANGUN and check the facts. ………..:)

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. I think we should concentrate more in local democracy in this issue. WiFi might no problem to health but what is the consultation process that we go though? People should have a say in this issue. Lim Guan Eng said this is a good project no need consultation session, so do 2nd bridge that “help” to reduce jam. What so call good and bad project, from who point of view? Why this company and not other? What is in the contract? We are taking a backward step in this issue by not asking all the details.
    Next time when he have another project, so called good project do we want to get involve or just let him decide everything for us? PR government can be another BN government if we not monitoring them all the time and we need to make sure people have a say. We finally reject BN after so long but slowly we let PR government to build up in BN spirit. BN people only try to listen to people in GE, we need to work with PR government to build better consultation and we look forward to restore local election. If PR government is sincerely wanted to restore local election, they should understand the important of consultation process.

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. EMF & Cell Radiation Is Damaging Your Brain and Skin.

    Complain about this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 Leave a Reply

Connect with Facebook

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>