Floods in Kuching: Is the Barrage any use?

Update on the floods:

Kuching flood background here.

Background to the role of the Kuching Barrage here. Note that many people dispute the effectiveness of the barrage, calling it a useless project.

CM Taib Mahmud did not make any statement on the Kuching floods at all. Instead, he was more interested in celebrating his golden wedding anniversary. How not to conclude that the CM is out of touch and beyond his use-by date? See his birthday party details here.

Businesses were badly affected by floods. See details here.

As for George Chan, he is of the view that Kuching folk need not worry anymore since the floods are over. But damage has been done. Here is another politician who appears to be out of touch.  See his view here.

Kuching and surrounding areas have been hit by floods, which has now receded. The Sarawak river overflowed its banks and water poured into the city. Floods also occurred in Sibu, Bintulu and the gold-mining town of Bau.

My friend over there says, tongue-in-cheek, that it was caused by an “act of God”.

More seriously, he thinks any combination of the following factors could be responsible for the flooding: heavy rainfall, high tide, historical factors such as poor planning of city buildings in the flood-prone plain.

Global warming too?

All “made worse by the useless barrage project which was supposed to control floods but which does not. Just a project for cronies”.

Another Sarawak resident claims that with the barrage, the water from the upstream to the sea is slowed down. “It is very complicated as the government says the barrage is not to be blamed but many persons-on-the street seem to think so.” For a sample of what Sarawakians are saying, check out Sarawak Talk.

Another possible factor, he adds, is the causeway across the Muara Tebas.

Related posts:

10 comments to Floods in Kuching: Is the Barrage any use?

  • The barrage is totally useless. It’s nothing but an (alleged) scam to enrich the … cronies. The story making the round is, the barrage was built to prevent the level of the Sarawak river from going down during low tide. (The story making the rounds is that a certain leader’s) Indonesian bomoh advised him that his fung shui will be better if the river bed is not too exposed. His mansion is (near the river).

  • i need to learn more about this flood cause Kuching is my hometown.. The only fact that i know is that the Kampung villages there are flooded badly

  • Exactly the barrage is useless

  • My goodness, did the authorities really sell the barrage project as a flood control measure ? What fools they really take us to be…

    Barrages are used in various places around the world to raise the level of a river upstream of the barrage, to make it more useful for boats or shipping , channel part of the water for irrigation or hydro-electric power. A barrage, by definition, is a free-flowing barrier across the river, has no effect on the nett amount of water flowing through it, hence has absolutely no use for flood mitigation.

  • Many comments both official and unoffical have been made each time there is a flood in Kuching. The 2009 flood was it as bad as the last one in 2004? Perhaps just as bad but the media didn’t highlight some of the areas as intensly this time like they did in 2004. Was it due to the fact it was supposed to be a happy week for Sarawakians on the 50th wedding anniversary of the state’s chief?

    I have heard of floods in the same areas as before. Locals blame it ignorantly or otherwise on the barrage and causeway across to Bako. I am pretty sure these two (the barrage and causeway) played a role in the flood. To what extend, perhaps one will have to go further back into history of floods in Kuching and its surrounding areas and make comparisons then and now.

    You also have to take into account development factors. Greed drove developers to clear and build on low lying swampy lands. Not only are these buildings notably houses and shophouses expensive, they are poorly built and prone to cracks and sinking. In certain areas drainage are not even properly built. The local councils are equally to be blamed for granting the permit to build on low lying areas. Sarawak is a large state with a relatively small population. Couldn’t they approve places that though further away are less prone to floods and other problems?

    Did the current construction of the Benggoh dam further away from Kuching contribute to the floods especially in the village of Giam?

    Two things that strike me about the floods this time in Kuching.

    First, we have a Deputy Chief Minister who is in charge of the state disaster management unit. At the height of floods, he says these places cannot be reached even by helicopters due to the bad weather.Hey what kind of disaster management plan is that? Get suitable helicopters that can fly anytime anywhere. We managed to send Dr SMS to space!!! Surely if Malaysia Boleh, so can Sarawak Boleh.

    Secondly and surprising even the lifts at the Sarawak General Hospital was affected by the flooding at its basement level. The four lifts’ doors were jamed. Another two which was under ‘repair’ or something to that effect had to be used instead. I have never heard of the Sarawak General Hospital ever been affected by the floods. So why this time? Could it be due to the renovation works that is currently be done?

    So finally who or what do you blame? Mother nature? Greed? Barrage? Development? Well of course first and foremost we need to blame ourselves for voting clowns into the government in the first place. Instead of servicing the people, these clowns are taking all for a ride. If doesn’t rain over the Chinese New Year period (king tides during that week as well), all will be forgotten of the 2009 floods until the next floods hit. It will keep coming back until we truly understand what we have done or contributed to its causes.

  • This is the result of cutting down the forest in Sarawak. Rain water is dumped into the rivers. Taib Mahmud is (allegedly) the cause of the flood.

  • [...] residents are blaming the barrage project constructed by the government because it failed to control the floods. Anilnetto also criticizes [...]

  • As to my understanding, the barrage is a component of the master plan for flood mitigation measures for the Sungai Sarawak water catchment. It is effective in preventing the king tide from coming and prevent flash flood to a certain extend.

  • Check out this site http://www.did.sarawak.gov.my/flood/hflood97-02.html …. then justify whether the barrage made any use … (note: The Barrage was completed on Aug 1998) …

  • seriously …. i was very pissed off when i saw the water slowly seeped into my house. why didn’t people talk about the condition in sarawak? i can only lament on our people’s reticence. where is our freedom of speech?! **** those chowderheads (referring to our freaking corrupted head(s) of government)!!

    i cannot believe that the barrage is of no use to our ppl AT ALL. how delusional.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

I believe in independent journalism that furthers the cause of justice, democracy, human rights and environmental protection. More on what I believe. How to support this blog.

PHOTOS

Why is this area prone to flash floods Permatang Pasir nomination day Jln Raja Uda settlers stuck in decaying transit homes Shophouses in George Town under threat 2009-Oct-28-SUK-Pk-006 Aliran AGM 2009

SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL

CAMPAIGN

trams penang

Supported by 46 bloggers