Comments on: Live – Meanwhile, back at the Anwar trial http://anilnetto.com/democracy/live-meanwhile-back-at-the-anwar-trial/ Let justice flow like a mighty river Wed, 23 May 2012 16:00:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: shy http://anilnetto.com/democracy/live-meanwhile-back-at-the-anwar-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-38959 shy Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:05:10 +0000 http://anilnetto.com/?p=18710#comment-38959 Thanks, Anil. Theoretically multisourcing is a good idea for your reasons above n also for impartiality. On principle, I completely agree and support it. Unfortunately, I personally felt the outcome too much and made things more cluttered/confusing than need be. Most of the overlap was between jonson, MI and MKini. It was good to have Edmund for legal aspects and do keep people like Anwar & LKS. Maybe Jonson can keep my feedback in mind while he is reporting too. I love him because he usually gets in before MI and adds a more personal feel (vs MI more mechanical). I think he was very professional in the first live coverage! But later as though he felt obliged to tweet to fill in the non-action. Also separate events can be kept as a separate post? Perhaps can announced "Breaking News" (eg. Penang hawker protest) during live feed, but afterwards make that a separate post/story. Anyway, thanks for receiving my feedback. Thank you to you, Jonson & others for the good work. I'll be happy however way you proceed with this. Happy holidays! :) Thanks, Anil.

Theoretically multisourcing is a good idea for your reasons above n also for impartiality. On principle, I completely agree and support it. Unfortunately, I personally felt the outcome too much and made things more cluttered/confusing than need be.

Most of the overlap was between jonson, MI and MKini. It was good to have Edmund for legal aspects and do keep people like Anwar & LKS.

Maybe Jonson can keep my feedback in mind while he is reporting too. I love him because he usually gets in before MI and adds a more personal feel (vs MI more mechanical). I think he was very professional in the first live coverage! But later as though he felt obliged to tweet to fill in the non-action.

Also separate events can be kept as a separate post? Perhaps can announced “Breaking News” (eg. Penang hawker protest) during live feed, but afterwards make that a separate post/story.

Anyway, thanks for receiving my feedback. Thank you to you, Jonson & others for the good work. I’ll be happy however way you proceed with this. Happy holidays! :)

Complain about this comment

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: anilnetto http://anilnetto.com/democracy/live-meanwhile-back-at-the-anwar-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-38947 anilnetto Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:45:32 +0000 http://anilnetto.com/?p=18710#comment-38947 Thanks, for the feedback. I thought it might be good to have multiple sourcing, just in case there were lapses in coverage by a source or mistakes in deciphering legal jargon in the court - then it could be corrected or filled in by the other sources. Perhaps I will reduce the sources next time. Thanks, for the feedback. I thought it might be good to have multiple sourcing, just in case there were lapses in coverage by a source or mistakes in deciphering legal jargon in the court – then it could be corrected or filled in by the other sources. Perhaps I will reduce the sources next time.

Complain about this comment

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: shy http://anilnetto.com/democracy/live-meanwhile-back-at-the-anwar-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-38942 shy Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:38:27 +0000 http://anilnetto.com/?p=18710#comment-38942 hey, don't mean to be ungrateful, because I am grateful... but i prefer the earlier live coverages of this trial. it was 'cleaner' - now we're getting more tweets/reporting, but more less important stuff are thrown in too, so just makes lots more reading for nothing much. i know there was complaint about not reporting fast enough, but i felt it was OK n now its just 'not clean'... if u know what i mean. on top of jonson's great reporting, we're also getting MI and (for a time) MKini, and all 3 basically say the same thing so I find myself filtering through too much for too little happening. and when multiple events are being reported on the same live coverage, then it just gets even messier. any way we could get crisper coverage? i know feed from variety of sources is a good idea, but... maybe others can share their thoughts too. if its just me then nvm. hey, don’t mean to be ungrateful, because I am grateful…

but i prefer the earlier live coverages of this trial. it was ‘cleaner’ – now we’re getting more tweets/reporting, but more less important stuff are thrown in too, so just makes lots more reading for nothing much. i know there was complaint about not reporting fast enough, but i felt it was OK n now its just ‘not clean’… if u know what i mean.

on top of jonson’s great reporting, we’re also getting MI and (for a time) MKini, and all 3 basically say the same thing so I find myself filtering through too much for too little happening.

and when multiple events are being reported on the same live coverage, then it just gets even messier.

any way we could get crisper coverage? i know feed from variety of sources is a good idea, but… maybe others can share their thoughts too. if its just me then nvm.

Complain about this comment

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Yang http://anilnetto.com/democracy/live-meanwhile-back-at-the-anwar-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-38898 Yang Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:00:22 +0000 http://anilnetto.com/?p=18710#comment-38898 Gerakan K, ... you are always in a state of denial. Again its not about delay, its about liar and integrity and we have a judge that (has been accused by Karpal of being) a liar... It is going the way of the like of Nigeria, Zimbabwe and Somali. where the Perak MB case has to be base on one in Nigeria...... Gerakan K,
… you are always in a state of denial. Again its not about delay, its about liar and integrity and we have a judge that (has been accused by Karpal of being) a liar…

It is going the way of the like of Nigeria, Zimbabwe and Somali. where the Perak MB case has to be base on one in Nigeria……

Complain about this comment

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: ilham http://anilnetto.com/democracy/live-meanwhile-back-at-the-anwar-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-38824 ilham Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:57:51 +0000 http://anilnetto.com/?p=18710#comment-38824 I ADVISE YOU TO CHECK WITH ONE OF PKR INNER CIRCLE BY THE NAME OF DIN MERICAN "DJ BLOGGERS " OR ZAID IBRAHIM EX-UMNO LAWYER. HE WILL BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHY IT'S DPP VS DSAI ... AND NOT SAIFUL & OTHERS VS DSAI ... I ADVISE YOU TO CHECK WITH ONE OF PKR INNER CIRCLE BY THE NAME OF DIN MERICAN “DJ BLOGGERS ” OR ZAID IBRAHIM EX-UMNO LAWYER.

HE WILL BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHY IT’S DPP VS DSAI … AND NOT SAIFUL & OTHERS VS DSAI …

Complain about this comment

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Law http://anilnetto.com/democracy/live-meanwhile-back-at-the-anwar-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-38819 Law Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:55:37 +0000 http://anilnetto.com/?p=18710#comment-38819 Can anyone tell me why the citation of the Sodomy case is stated as Public Prosecutor v DSAI. (Should) the lawyers should hava asked the Crt to change it to Saiful & Othrs ... v DSAI(?) This would make the proceedings much clearer. When the PP's name is used, prosecution is understood to be taken and done for and in the interest of the public and nation. When an individual's name is used, prosecution is commenced and done privately for the benefit of those individuals concerned. (To me) this sodomy trial is not a public prosecution but a private prosection by Saiful backed by (others) ... Can anyone tell me why the citation of the Sodomy case is stated as Public Prosecutor v DSAI. (Should) the lawyers should hava asked the Crt to change it to Saiful & Othrs … v DSAI(?) This would make the proceedings much clearer.

When the PP’s name is used, prosecution is understood to be taken and done for and in the interest of the public and nation. When an individual’s name is used, prosecution is commenced and done privately for the benefit of those individuals concerned.

(To me) this sodomy trial is not a public prosecution but a private prosection by Saiful backed by (others) …

Complain about this comment

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Gerakan K http://anilnetto.com/democracy/live-meanwhile-back-at-the-anwar-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-38817 Gerakan K Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:35:13 +0000 http://anilnetto.com/?p=18710#comment-38817 Another delay succeeded. Hopefully this will not be another 11 years case. Another delay succeeded. Hopefully this will not be another 11 years case.

Complain about this comment

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]>